摘要
目的:评价临床路径在ICU昏迷待诊患者中运用的效果。方法:新收入ICU98例昏迷待诊患者随机分成实验组、对照组各49例,分别实施传统诊治、护理方法和临床路径诊治、护理法,比较2组患者相同时段的意识状态、确诊时间、入住ICU时间及费用、并发症发生率等指标。结果:各指标存在显著差异(P<0.05)。结论:各指标临床路径更科学、更符合急救特点。
Objective：To evaluate the effectiveness of clinical pathway to coma patients in the ICU. Methods：Patients were randomly divided into experimental group and control group,each 49 cases.Traditional treatment,nursing care and clinical treatment path method were implemented between two groups.We compared with the state of consciousness,confirmed time,ICU stay time and rescue costs and complication rates between two groups. Results：There were significantly difference in the two groups（P0.05）. Conclusion：The clinical pathway is more scientific and more suitable for emergency coma patients.
出处
《现代临床医学》
2011年第2期138-139,共2页
Journal of Modern Clinical Medicine
