摘要
目的 比较全胃切除术中空肠造口与留置鼻空肠营养管的应用效果.方法 采用回顾性分析方法,按肠内营养支持方法不同将23例行全胃切除患者分为留置鼻空肠营养管组（A组）17例和空肠造口组（B组）6例.比较两组患者术后睡眠情况、排痰不利、肛门恢复排气时间、咽喉疼痛、恶心、肺部感染、吻合口漏等术后并发症发生率.结果 与A组比较,B组患者睡眠不佳、排痰不利、咽喉疼痛、恶心、呕吐明显减少;肛门恢复排气时间显著提前.吻合口漏、十二指肠残端瘘、腹腔和肺部感染等并发症两组间无明显差异.结论 在全胃切除术中应用空肠造口,相比留置鼻空肠营养管,患者痛苦更小,心理负担更轻,更易于护理,康复更快,是一种有效、安全、合理的策略.
Objective To explore the effect of the surgical technique of jejunum fistula and conventional indwelling nasogastric tube with total gastrectomy. Methods The clinical data of 23 advanced gastric cancer patients with total gastrectomy were retrospetively analyzed. Among 23 cases, 17 received jejunum fistual and 6 received indwelling nasogastric. The time to flatus and the ratio of postoperative complications including throat ache, nausea,pneumonia, anastomotic leak were compared. Results Compared with A group, the incidence of disadvantage spit sputum, dyssomnia, throat ache and nausea in B group reduced significantly, the time to flatus was advanced in B group. And other postoperative complications had no difference between two groups. Conclusion Jejunum fistula was rational, safe and effective in patients with total gastrectomy
出处
《中国基层医药》
CAS
2010年第24期3361-3362,共2页
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词
空肠造口
全胃切除术
肠内营养
Jejunostomy
Total gastrectomy
Enteral nutrition
