摘要
针对香港终审法院有关《基本法》适用的3个判例,着重对文本、目的和语境的解释方法的话语特征和具体应用方式进行可以看出分析,普通法体制下解释方法的连贯性与灵活性使得香港法院仍然从实质上保有基本法适用的相对独立的权力。这值得内地学者进一步关注。
This is an observation and reflection of the interpreting methods employed by the Court of Final Appeal in Hong Kong. Three cases are selected and the textual （literal）, purposive and contextual approaches advocated by the Justices in their opinions are analyzed, and especially the application and interaction of the approaches are observed. This article intends to indicate that consistency and flexibility inherent in the three interpretation means are the core spirits of common law interpretation worthy notice while implementing the Basic Law of Kang Kong.
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第1期182-193,共12页
Modern Law Science
关键词
基本法解释
文本解释
目的解释
语境解释
连贯性
灵活性
interpretation of Basic Law
textual interpretation
purposive interpretation
contextual interpretation
consistency
flexibility
