期刊文献+

图像引导下鼻咽癌放射治疗中颈部变形旋转误差研究 被引量:7

Rotation Errors Due to Neck Deformation in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Radiotherapy with Image Guiding
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的利用不同匹配区域对锥形束CT(CBCT)与定位CT(FBCT)分别配准,测量出鼻咽癌放射治疗中颈部的变形误差。方法分析2007年4月2008年12月收治鼻咽癌患者23例,调整治疗床前198次CBCT扫描。将鼻咽部扫描CBCT图像匹配区域分为上下两个区域进行对比分析。其中上匹配区域为:上界为蝶窦上缘,下界为颈4下缘,侧界包括下颌骨外轮廓,前界为上颌窦1/2,后界为平棘突后缘;下匹配区域为:上界约颈4下缘,下界约胸2-3下缘,侧界包括椎体外轮廓,前界包括皮肤,后界平棘突后缘。匹配方式选择骨,比较匹配结果差异。结果选择上与下匹配区域结果除Y(头脚)方向旋转误差无统计学差异外,余均有统计学差异(P<0.05)。差值在X(左右)、Z(前后)、Y(头脚)方向平移分别为(1.14±2.80)、(0.47±1.41)、(0.58±3.88)mm,旋转误差X、Y、Z方向分别为(0.90±1.98)、(0.80±2.03)、(0.68±1.90)°。结论鼻咽癌放射治疗中颈部区域存在一定变形误差,通过CBCT引导发现变形误差并进行正确纠正是必须的,结合临床实际及靶区与危及器官的变化为重新计划提供依据。 Objective To investigate the rotation errors due to neck deformation in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) radiotherapy with different match areas to register conebeam CT(CBCT) from image guiding and fanbeam (FBCT) from simulation. Methods A total of 198 pre-correction CBCT data sets from 23 NPC patients from April 2007 to December 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. The matching areas in CBCT images were divided into up and down region of interest (ROI). For the up ROI, the superior, inferior, left and right, anterior, and posterior boundary were set parallel with sphenoid sinus up side, C4 down side, mandible outside, and 1/2 of maxillary air sinus and acanthi. For the down ROI, the lines were set parallel with C4 down side, T2-3 down side, neck outside, skin surface and acanthi respectively in all directions. All registrations were performed automatically by bony anatomy and the results were compared. Results The registration results by the up and the down ROI showed significant difference except Y direction for rotation. The translation error was (1.14±2.80),(0.47±1.41),and (0.58±3.88) mm, respectively; and the rotation error was (0.90±1.98),(0.80 ±2.03),and (0.68±1.90) ° in X, Y, and Z direction, respectively. Conclusions There are some significant deformation errors at neck areas in NPC radiotherapy. It is important to find out the deformation and correct it with CBCT image guiding. This kind of error information may provide clues for re-planning in addition to clinical practice and the changes of clinical targets and involved organs.
出处 《华西医学》 CAS 2010年第12期2147-2150,共4页 West China Medical Journal
关键词 锥形束CT 鼻咽癌 变形误差 Conebeam CT Nasopharyngeal cancer Rotation error
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Wang J, Bai S, Chen NY,et al. Preminary study on the clinical feasibility and effect of online cone beam computer tomography guided intensityrr/odulated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Radiother Oncoh 2009,90(2) : 221- 227.
  • 2Xu F, Wang J, Bai S, et al. Detection of intrafractionl tumor position error in radiotherapy utilizing cone beam computed tomography[J ]. Radiot her Oncol, 2008,89 (3):311-319.
  • 3Den RB,Doemer A, Kubicek G,etal. Daily image guidance with cone-beam computed tomography for head-and neck cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a prospective study[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2010,76(5): 1353- 1359.
  • 4van Kranen S, van Beek S, Rasch C, et al. Setup uncertainties of anatomical sub regions in head-and-neck cancer patients after offline CBCT guidance[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2009, 73(5):1566-1573.
  • 5Zhang L,Garden AS, Lo J, el al. Multiple regions-of-interest analysis of setupuncertainties for head and-neck cancer radiotherapy[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006, 64 (5) :1559-1569.
  • 6Polat B,Wilbert J, Baier K, et al. Nonrigid patient setup errors in the head-and-neck region[J].Strahlenther Onkol, 2007,183 (9):506 -511.
  • 7van Beek S, van Kranen S, Mencarelli A, et al. First clinical experience with a multiple region of interest registration and correction method in radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer patients[J].Radiother Oncol, 2010,94: 213-217.
  • 8van Kranen S, van Beek S, Menearelli A, et al. Correction strategies to manage deformations in head-and-neck radiotherapy[J].Radiother Oncol, 2010,94(2) : 199-205.
  • 9van Herk M, Kooy HM. Automatic three dimensional correlation of CT-CT, CT-MRI, and CT-SPECT using chamfer matching [J]. Med Phys, 1994,21(7):1163-1178.
  • 10Meyer J, Wilbert J, Baier K, et al. Positioning accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in combination with a HexaPOD robot treatment table[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2007,67 (4):1220-1228.

同被引文献80

  • 1王军良,周振山,薛娴,盛洪国.锥形束CT图像与计划CT图像配准方法分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2011,28(1):2386-2388. 被引量:14
  • 2上官小玲,张强克,徐建国.胸部肿瘤调强放疗中摆位误差的原因与控制[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2011,28(4):2716-2717. 被引量:10
  • 3戴建荣,胡逸民.图像引导放疗的实现方式[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(2):132-135. 被引量:184
  • 4沈捷,张福泉,邱杰,胡克,张明杰.应用EPID对放射治疗摆位误差的研究[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2006,26(3):308-308. 被引量:39
  • 5Wang J, Bai S, Chen NY, et al. Preminary study on the clinical feasibility and effect of online cone beam computer tomography- guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Radio and Oncol, 2009, 90(2): 221-227.
  • 6Xu F, Wang J, Bai S, et al. Detection of intrafractionl tumor position error in radiotherapy utilizing cone beam computed tomography[J]. Radio Oncol, 2008, 89(3):311-319.
  • 7Zhong RM, Wang J, Jiang XQ, et al. Hypofraction radiotherapy of liver tumor using cone beam computed tomography guidance combined with active breath control by long breath-holding[J]. Radio Oncol, 2012(3), 104: 379-385.
  • 8Wu WC, Leung WS, Kay SS, et al. A comparison between electronic portal imaging device and cone beam CT in radiotherapy verification of nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Med Dosim, 2011, 36(1): 109-112.
  • 9Borst GR, Sonke JJ, Betgen A, et al. Kilo-voltage cone-beam computed tomography setup measurements for lung cancer patients; first clinical results and comparison with electronic portal-imaging device[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2007, 68(2): 555-561.
  • 10Guckenberger M, Meyer J, Vordermark D, et al. Magnitude and clinical relevance of translational and rotational patient setup errors a cone-beam CT study [J]. Int Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006, 65(3): 934-942.

引证文献7

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部