论著作权合理使用制度的适用范围被引量：74

The Scope of Fair Use Doctrine in Copyright Law

导出

摘要由于合理使用处在权利与限制的交界处,其适用范围的任何变化,都可能重塑著作权法。面对新技术的冲击,在确定合理使用的适用范围时,不能因技术的便利而干涉著作权市场对信息资源的配置,而应恪守合理使用最初的立法理由,将其定位为对市场失灵的弥补,在利用行为有助于公共利益的基础上,考察其是否符合"交易不能"或"正外部性"市场失灵,同时把对作品潜在市场的影响视为最关键的判断标准。这不但维护了著作权的私权属性,更是界定合理使用适用范围的最佳路径。 Connected to both copyrights and its limitation,any changes of fair use doctrine will somehow rebuild copyright law. Even impacted by new technology,rights allocation by copyright market should not be interrupted at will,and fair use should abide by its original justification,which is to remedy the market failure in copyright market. When the use of copyrighted works is for public purpose,market failure based on transaction costs or positive externalities needs to be considered,and the effect of the use upon the potential market for the copyrighted work should be treated as the key factor. These rules can keep the copyright as private right and be the best way to define the Scope of fair use.

作者熊琦

机构地区中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心

出处《法学家》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期86-98,178,共13页 The Jurist

关键词合理使用著作权市场失灵交易成本 Fair Use Copyright Market Failure Transaction Costs

分类号 D923.41 [政治法律—民商法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献72

1Paul Goldstein, Fair Use in a Changing World, 50 J. Copyright Soc'y U.S.A. 133 (2003) .
2L. Ray Patterson & Stanley F. Birch Jr., A Unified Theory of Copyright ( Craig Joyce ed. ), printed in 46 Hous. L. Rev. 215 (2009) .
3Wendy J. Gordon, Fair Use as Market Failure : A Structural and Economic Analysis of the "Betamax" Case and Its Predecessors, 82 Colum. L. Rev. 1600 (1982) .
4Wendy J. Gordon, Excuse and Justification in the Law of Fair Use: Transaction Costs Have Always Been Only Part of The Story, 50 J. Copyright Soc'y U.S.A. 149 (2003) .
5Zohar Efroni, Towards a Doctrine of "Fair Access" in Copyright: The Federal Circuit's Accord, 46 Idea 99 (2005).
6Jane C. Ginsburg, From Having Copies to Experiencing Works: The Development of an Access Right in U. S. Copyright Law, 50 J. Copyright Society U.S.A. 113 (2003) .
7Tom W. Bell, Fair Use v. Fared Use: The Impact of Automated Rights Management on Copyright's Fair Use Doctrine, 76 N. C. L. Rev. 557 (1998) .
8Elisabeth Hanratty, C, oogle Library: Beyond Fair Use?, 2004 Duke L. Tech. Rev. 10 (2005) .
9Dellar v. Samuel Goldwyn, Inc., 104 F.2d 661 (2d Cir. 1939), p.662.
10Paul Goldstein, Fair Use in a Changing World, 50 J. Copyright Soc'y U.S.A. 133 (2003), p. 134.

二级参考文献31

1See Henry H. Perritt Jr. & Christopher J. Lhulier, Focus on Cyberlaw: Information Access Rights Based on International Human Rights Law, 45 Buffalo L. Rev. 899 (1997).
2See Laura N. Gasaway, The New Access Right and its Impact on Libraries and Library Users, 10 J. Intell. Prop. L. 269 (2003).
3章忠信.著作权法制中的“科技保护措施”与“权利管理资讯”之探讨.万国法律,2000,(5).
4See Pamela Samuelson, Intellectual Property and the Digital Economy: Why the Anti -Circumvention Regulations Need to be Revised, 14 Berkeley Tech. L. J. 519(1999).
5See Jane C. Ginsburg, From Having Copies to Experiencing Works: The Development of an Access Right in U. S. Copyright Law, 50 J. Copyright Society U. S. A. 113,(2003).
6See Robert P. Merges, Peter S. Mensell & Mark A. Lemley, Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age (4th edition), Aspen Publishers (2006).
7Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. , 102 S. Ct. 2926 (1982).
8Zohar Efroni, A Momentary Lapse of Reason: Digital Copyright, the DMCA and a Dose of Common Sense, 28 Colum. J. L.& Arts249 (2005).
9Thomas Heide, Access Control and Innovation under the Emerging EU Electronic Commerce Framework, 15 Berkeley Tech. L. J. 993 (2000).
10Glynn S. Lunney Jr. , The Death of Copyright: Digital Technology, Private Copying, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 87 Val. L. Rev. 813(2001).