期刊文献+

岭澳核电站二期LOFW+ATWS事故的氢气风险研究 被引量:4

Hydrogen Safety Analysis of Ling'ao Ⅱ NPP under LOFW+ATWS Accident
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 应用安全壳内氢气安全分析程序(GASFLOW)模拟了岭澳核电站二期在失去给水+未能紧急停堆的预计瞬变(LOFW+ATWS)事故下安全壳内氢气和水蒸汽的行为,对事故进程中氢气的风险进行了安全分析,特别是对氢气缓解系统的效果进行了评价。模拟结果说明,安全壳内温度与压力的变化与水蒸汽的喷放密切相关;水蒸汽在安全壳内会呈现一定的分层现象;泄压箱隔间与稳压器隔间在氢气释放峰值阶段可能发生火焰加速现象。 This paper applies the three dimensional CFD code GASFLOW to simulate the behavior of hydrogen and steam under hypothetical LOFW+ATWS accident.Analysis shows that the average temperature and pressure are dominated by the inventory of the steam released to the containment.The calculation results also show that during the hydrogen release time,the average recombine rate of the hydrogen mitigation system can reach 40g/s,but the flame acceleration criterion in the code assess that the flame acceleration may occur in quench tank compartment and pressurizer compartment during hydrogen release peak.
出处 《核动力工程》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第1期34-38,52,共6页 Nuclear Power Engineering
关键词 氢气风险 氢气安全分析程序 安全壳 氢气复合器 严重事故 Hydrogen risk GASFLOW Containment Recombiner Severe accident
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Travis J R, Necker G A, Royl P A. Computational Fluid Dynamics Code for Gases Aerosols, and Combustion[R]. Theory and Computational Model, Reports FZKA-5994, LA-13357-M, 1998.
  • 2Jongtae Kim, Seong-Wan Hong, Sang-Baik Kim, et al. Three-Dimensional Behaviors of the Hydrogen and Steam in the APR1400 Containment During a Hypothetical Loss of Feed Water Accident[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2007, 34(12): 992-1001.
  • 3Leckner B. Spectral and Total Emissivity of Water Vapor and Carbon Dioxide[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1972, 19(1): 33-48.
  • 4Bachellerie E, Arnould F, Auglaire M, et al. Generic Approach for Designing and Implementing a Passive Autocatalytic Recombiner PAR-system in Nuclear Power Plant Containment[J], Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2003, 221(1-3): 151-165.
  • 5Breitung W. Chan C K., Dorofeev S B. Flame Accelera- tion and Deflagration to Detonation Transition in Nuclear Safety[R]. SOAR. NEA/CSNI, 2000.

同被引文献19

  • 1臧明昌.第三代核电和西屋公司AP1000评述[J].核科学与工程,2005,25(2):106-115. 被引量:36
  • 2肖建军,周志伟,经荥清.基于火焰加速和燃爆转变准则的氢气点火安全性研究[J].原子能科学技术,2006,40(5):563-569. 被引量:4
  • 3王新敏.ANSYS工程数值分析[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2007.
  • 4BakerWE.爆炸危险性及其评估[M].张国顺,文以民,刘定吉,译.北京:群众出版社,1988.
  • 5Smith C,et al. Review of international activities in acci- dent management and decision making in the nuclear in- dustry[A], Systems Analysis Programs for Hands-OnIntegrated Reliability Evaluations (SAPHIRE) Basic Training Course and SAPHIRE Basics Workshop Manu- al[C]. 1999.
  • 6Dorofeev SB, et al. Deflagration to detonation transition in large confined volume of lean hydrogen-air mixtures [J].Combustion and Flame, 1996, 104(1): 95-110.
  • 7Breitung W, et al. Flame acceleration and deflagration-to-detonation transition in nuclear safety[J]. State-of- the-Art Report by a Group of Experts), OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, NEA/CSNI, 2000.
  • 8罗迪著,刘兰芬,王能家译.湍浮力射流与羽流[M].北京:海洋出版社,1991.
  • 9邹志强,等.主泵隔间氢气风险的CFD研究[J].中国核动力研究设计院科学技术年报,2010,74-75.
  • 10邓坚,曹学武.氢气催化复合器对核电厂严重事故的缓解效果[J].原子能科学技术,2008,42(10):906-910. 被引量:6

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部