期刊文献+

高龄结直肠癌患者腹腔镜与开腹手术的安全性比较 被引量:5

A clinical study of comparison of laparoscopy and open radical resection for colorectal carcinoma in elder patients
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨高龄结直肠癌患者腹腔镜根治术的安全性及可行性。方法回顾性分析2008年1月至2009年12月同期收治的75岁以上高龄结直肠癌患者腹腔镜手术组(26例)和传统开腹手术组(43例)资料,对两组临床疗效和并发症进行对比分析。结果腹腔镜组中有1例中转开腹手术,中转率3.8%。腹腔镜组的手术失血量较开腹组少,(104.5±98.2)mL vs.(179.5±112.6)mL,P<0.05;腹腔镜组的肠道功能恢复时间较开腹组短,(2.27±0.46)d vs.(3.68±0.58)d,P<0.05;腹腔镜组术后并发症发生率11.5%(3/26),而开腹组为30.2%(13/43),明显高于腹腔镜组(P<0.05)。两组手术时间和阳性淋巴结数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论结直肠癌腹腔镜根治术用于治疗高龄结直肠癌患者同样安全有效,可以降低术后并发症的发生率。 Objective To evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic resection for colorectal carcinoma in elderly patients. Methods From January 2008 to December 2009, 69 patients over 75 years underwent radical resection of colorectal carcinoma in our hospital. Among them, 26 received laparoscopic procedure and 43 underwent open surgery. The outcomes and complications after these 2 surgeries were analyzed retrospective- ly. Results In the iaparoscopic group, 1 patient (3.8%) was converted to open surgery. The mean blood loss ( 104.5 ±98.2 mL vs. 179.5 ±112.6 mL, P 〈0.05) and time to restoration of intestinal function (2.27 ± 0.46d vs. 3.68 ± 0.58d, P 〈0.05 ) were significantly different between the laparoscopy group and open surgery group. The complication rate in the laparoscopic group was 11.5 % (3/26) , which was significantly lower than that in the open group [30.2% (13/43) ,P 〈0.05]. However, no significant difference was found in the surgical duration and the number of resected lymph nodes ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusions Laparoscopic radical resection is a safe, beneficial and minimally invasive surgery for elderly patients with colorectal carcinoma, the method can reduce the rate of postoperative complications.
作者 王伟 尹家俊
出处 《中国肿瘤外科杂志》 CAS 2011年第1期7-10,共4页 Chinese Journal of Surgical Oncology
关键词 老年人 结直肠癌 腹腔镜手术 开腹手术 疗效比较 手术失血量 肠道功能恢复时间 安全性 elderly colorectal carcinoma laparoscopic surgery celiotomy comparative effica- cy blood loss time to restoration of intestinal function safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Schlachta CM, Mamazza J,Seshadri PA, et al. Determinants of outcomes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery:a multiple regression anal- ysis of 416 resections [J].Surg Endosc ,2000,14 ( 3 ) :258-263.
  • 2Chautard J, Alves A,Zalinski S, et al. Laparoscopic coloreetal surgery in elderly patients: a matched case-control study in 178 patients [ J ]. J Am Coll Surg,2008,206 (2) :255-260.
  • 3De Santis L, Frigo F. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly [J]. Acta Biomed,2005,76( 1 ) :24-26.
  • 4Puig-la,Calle J Jr, Quayle J, et al. Favorable short-term and long- term outcome after elective radical rectal cancer resection in patients 75 years of age or older [ J ]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2000,43 (12) :1704-1709.
  • 5Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, Pattan-Arun J, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colon and rectal cancer surgery: feasibility, short- term, and oncologieal outcomes[J]. Surgery, 2010, 148 ( 2 ) : 378-385.
  • 6罗华星,余佩武.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的应用现状与进展[J].肿瘤学杂志,2006,12(6):445-448. 被引量:6
  • 7Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, et al. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer [ J ]. Br J Surg, 2010,97 ( 11 ) : 1638-1645.
  • 8Hemandas AK, Abdelrahman T, Flashman KG, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery produces better outcomes for high risk cancer patients compared to open surgery [ J ]. Ann Surg,2010,252 ( 1 ) :84-89.

二级参考文献16

  • 1Leroy J, Ananian P, Rubino F, et al. The impact of obesity on technical feasibility and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic left coleetomy[J].Ann Surg,2005,241 (1):69-76.
  • 2Gonza'lez IA,Malago' n AM,Ferna' ndez EL, et al. Impact of previous abdominal surgery on colorectal laparoscopy results: a comparative clinical study[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2006,16(1) :8-11.
  • 3Rullier E, Laurent C, Bretagnol F, et al. Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas. The end of the 2-cm distal rule[J]. Ann Surg, 2005,241(3): 465-469.
  • 4Champauh GG, Barrat C, Raselli R, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal carcinoma-a prospective clinical trial involving 157 cases with a mean follow-up of5 years[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2002,12(2) :88-95.
  • 5Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2004,350(3):2050-2059.
  • 6Morino M,Parini U,Giraudo G,et al. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision :a consecutive series of 100 patients[J]. Ann Surg, 2003,237 (3) : 335-342.
  • 7Polliand C, Barrat C, Champauh G. Laparoscopic resection of low rectal cancer with a mean follow-up of seven years[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2005,15(3):144-148.
  • 8Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial[J]. Lancet, 2002, 359(9325): 2224-2229.
  • 9Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Hugel O, et al. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group. Oncological quality and preliminary long-term results in laparoscopic colorectal surgery[J]. Surg Endosc ,2003,17 (6):903-910.
  • 10Werner SD, Cohen SM. Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy [J]. Br JSurg, 1995,82(3):295-298.

共引文献5

同被引文献35

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部