摘要
扬雄的"童子雕虫篆刻,壮夫不为也",长期以来一直被认为是矫枉过正的偏激之辞,是文学取消主义的始作俑者。我们认为这是对扬雄的误读,误读的根源在于对"雕虫"的错误理解,"雕虫"当读为"雕彤",是"雕饰"意思,而不是人们通常认为的"学写虫书"。基于此,扬雄这句话的本意是反对过度的文饰,提倡文与质的统一。
Traditionally,Chinese poetry is divided into various subgenres,such as Ci and Qu.There is also a kind of prose-poem called Fu.Yang Xiong＇s proposition that ＂insignificant skills such as poet writing and seal cutting are such trifles that they should be practiced by children rather than adults＂ has always been viewed as something radical in exceeding the proper limits when righting a wrong.For this,Yang had traditionally been labeled as the originator of literary deconstructionism.However,this paper argues that such interpretations of Yang＇s words are at least partially wrong.Yang＇s original intention of saying such,in the eyes of the present author,was to rectify the literary tendency of inordinately stressing the practice of poetry writing with ornate embellishments,and Yang advocated unity between outer literary forms and the quality of content.
出处
《南阳师范学院学报》
CAS
2010年第11期73-75,共3页
Journal of Nanyang Normal University
关键词
虫
彤
辞人之赋
＂Chong＂（insignificant skill）
＂Tong＂（embellishment）
poetry
