期刊文献+

不同营养调控剂对肉牛增重性能、胴体品质和肉品质的影响 被引量:1

Effects of Different Nutrition Additives on Gain Performance,Carcass Quality and Meat Quality of Beef
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】研究不同营养调控剂对肉牛生产性能、胴体品质和肉品质的的影响,为开发营养调控剂用于改善牛肉品质提供科学依据。【方法】试验选用18只荷斯坦公牛,依据体重和类型随机分为3组,试验组分别在精料中添加调控剂Ⅰ(100 g/d)和调控剂Ⅱ(108 g/d),对照组饲喂基础日粮。【结果】对照组、试验Ⅰ组、试验Ⅱ组,平均日增重分别为1.633 0、2.042 0和1.833 0 kg,与对照组相比,试验I组比对照组提高25.04%,差异显著(P<0.05);试验Ⅰ组和试验Ⅱ组的粗蛋白含量显著高于对照组(P<0.05),试验Ⅰ组的甘氨酸和精氨酸含量与对照组相比差异显著(P<0.05);试验Ⅱ组的赖氨酸、亮氨酸含量明显高于对照组(P<0.05),异亮氨酸含量差异极显著(P<0.01)。试验Ⅱ组对牛肉的背最长肌(IMP)和臀中肌(IMP)含量都极显著高于对照组(P<0.01),并且效果显著高于试验Ⅰ组(P<0.05)。【结论】两种营养调控剂都可以提高肉牛增重性能,改善牛肉品质。 【Objective】The main purpose of this article is study the effects of different nutrition additives on gain performance,carcass quality and meat quality of beef to provide scientific basis for research and development of nutrition additives.【Method】The selected 18 Holstein bull were divided radomly into 3 groups according to their weight and type.The experimental group fed chiefly on basal diet.【Result】The result indicated that there was significant difference of Average daily gain(ADG) among these groups,ADG of experimentⅠ was 2.042 0 kg,higher than that of the control group(P0.05).ExperimentⅠand ExperimentⅡcould significantly increase the CP of meat(P0.05).His,Lys,Leu,Gly contents are higher than that of the control group(P0.05).and the inosinic acid content in every tiral group was higher than that of the control and adding nutrition addtivesⅡgroup was the best.【Conclusion】The two nutrition additives can improve the gain performance and the meat quality of beef.
机构地区 新疆农垦科学院
出处 《新疆农业科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第12期2496-2500,共5页 Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences
基金 国家科技部科技攻关项目"新疆肉牛产业化关键技术研究与示范"(2004BAJD0004)
关键词 肉牛 营养调控剂 增重性能 肉品质 肌甘酸 beef nutrition additives gain performance beef quality inosinic acid
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献19

  • 1李毓杰,王继伟,赵冬梅.对磷酸盐增强肉保水性机理探讨[J].肉类工业,1993(10):29-34. 被引量:14
  • 2洪庆慈泽.食品化学基础[M].江苏科学出版社,1990.309-402.
  • 3李学孚 林亮全 虞建仁.台湾土鸡与肉鸡在滋味物质上之差异性研究[J].中国农业化学会志(台湾),1993,31(5):605-613.
  • 4苏淑贞.鹌鹑、鸡、鸽子肌肉中的肌苷酸含量的比较.家禽,1987,(2):32-33.
  • 5李建凡 黄梅南.不同品种鸡胸肌肉中肌苷酸含量比较[A].中国农科院畜牧研究所.优质黄羽鸡品系选育和配套研究论文集[c].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1995.287-290.
  • 6Terasaki M, Kajikawa, Fujita E. Studies on the flavor of meats. Part 1. Formation and degradation of inosinic acids in meats[J]. Agric Biol Chem, 1965, 29(3): 208-215.
  • 7Davidek J, Khan A W. Estimation of inosinic acid in chicken muscle and its formation and degradation during post-mortem aging[J]. J Food Sci, 1967, 32(2):155-157.
  • 8Fujimura S, Muramoto T, Katsukawa M. Chemical analysis and sensory evalution of free amino acids and 5'-inosinic acid in meat of Hinai-dori,Japanese native chicken. Comparison with broilers and layer pullets[J]. Animal Science and Technology (Japan), 1994
  • 9Khan A W,Davider J,Lentz C P. Degradation of inosinic acid in chicken muscle during aseptic storage and its possible use as an index of quality[J]. J Food Sci, 1968, 33(1): 25-27.
  • 10Kuchiba-Manabe M, Matoba T, Hasegawa K. Sensory changes in umami taste of inosine 5'-monophosphate solution after heating[J]. J Food Sci, 1991, 56(5): 1429-1432.

共引文献179

同被引文献16

引证文献1

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部