摘要
目的：比较LEEP和微波法治疗宫颈糜烂的疗效.方法：收集115例宫颈糜烂患者,比较两组患者基线资料后,随机分为LEEP和微波治疗组,分别于治疗后第2、4和8周评估患者宫颈糜烂愈合情况,依据不同病变程度分组,比较两组患者总有效例数.结果：两组患者基线资料间无明显差别 轻度宫颈糜烂病变患者,采用LEEP和微波法治疗,疗效无明显差别 中度和重度宫颈糜烂病变患者,采用LEEP法总有效率高于微波法,差别具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.结论：LEEP治疗中重度宫颈糜烂病变患者疗效优于微波法 轻度病变患者,两种治疗方法疗效无明显差别.
Objective： We compared the effect of treating cervical erosion by LEEP and microwave therapy. Method： We enrolled 115 patients with cervical erosion and compared patients＇ baseline information. 115 patients were randomly divided into LEEP and microwave group. We evaluated the recovery degree of cervical erosion 2, 4 and 8 weeks after treatment, and then we compared the total recovery cases of these tow groups in varied degree of cervical erosion. Results： There was no difference of baseline information between these two groups and the efficacy of LEEP and microwave treatment was comparable in the mild cervical erosion group. While in moderate and severe cervical erosion group, the total recovery cases with LEEP treatment is significant greater than microwave （P〈0.05）. Conclusion： LEEP treatment is superior to microwave in patients with moderate and severe cervical erosion, while there is no difference in mild cervical erosion.
出处
《中医临床研究》
2010年第24期26-27,共2页
Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
