摘要
中世纪城市国家的"公债"是一种"借贷"形式,其"合法性"论争正是围绕这种"借贷"形式和教会"高利贷禁令"的关系而展开。经过长期而曲折的论争,"公债"最终和"高利贷"划清界限并实现了其"合法化"。"合法化"的主要原因即在于此时期西欧经济与社会情境的变迁以及与之相适应的知识精英对其做出的积极回应:一方面,变化了的社会情境使人们无法逃避以"公债"为重要内容的新型生活方式,奠定了"公债""合法性"的社会根基;另一方面,变化中的知识精英的话语阐释引导并最终完成了其"合法化"。
The ＂public debt＂ of the city-states in the Middle Ages was a form of ＂loan＂ and the controversy over its ＂licit ness＂ had been centered on its relationship with the Church＇s ＂usury prohibition＂. After a long-period debate the ＂public debt＂ had been distinguished from ＂usury＂ and thus come to its ＂legalization＂,for which the major reasons lie in the change of the economic and social context and the creative response of the intellectual elite of the time to it.On the one hand,under the changed context,the citizens can not avoid a new lifestyle featuring ＂public debt＂,which laid a social foundation for its ＂licit ness＂ ; on the other hand,the intellectual elite,through their changing interpretation of the ＂public debt＂ and of ＂usury＂,accomplished the ＂legalization＂ of ＂public debt＂.
出处
《史学集刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第1期123-127,共5页
Collected Papers of History Studies
基金
复旦大学历史学系博士生科研基金资助项目
关键词
中世纪
城市国家
公债
合法性
The Middle Ages
city-states
public debt
Licit ness
