期刊文献+

Modelling Study to Compare the Flow and Heat Transfer Characteristics of Low-Power Hydrogen,Nitrogen and Argon Arc-Heated Thrusters 被引量:6

Modelling Study to Compare the Flow and Heat Transfer Characteristics of Low-Power Hydrogen,Nitrogen and Argon Arc-Heated Thrusters
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 A modelling study is performed to compare the plasma flow and heat transfer characteristics of low-power arc-heated thrusters (arcjets) for three different propellants: hydrogen, nitrogen and argon. The all-speed SIMPLE algorithm is employed to solve the governing equations, which take into account the effects of compressibility, Lorentz force and Joule heating, as well as the temperature- and pressure-dependence of the gas properties. The temperature, velocity and Mach number distributions calculated within the thruster nozzle obtained with different propellant gases are compared for the same thruster structure, dimensions, inlet-gas stagnant pressure and arc currents. The temperature distributions in the solid region of the anode-nozzle wall are also given. It is found that the flow and energy conversion processes in the thruster nozzle show many similar features for all three propellants. For example, the propellant is heated mainly in the near-cathode and constrictor region, with the highest plasma temperature appearing near the cathode tip; the flow transition from the subsonic to supersonic regime occurs within the constrictor region; the highest axial velocity appears inside the nozzle; and most of the input propellant flows towards the thruster exit through the cooler gas region near the anode-nozzle wall. However, since the properties of hydrogen, nitrogen and argon, especially their molecular weights, specific enthMpies and thermal conductivities, are different, there are appreciable differences in arcjet performance. For example, compared to the other two propellants, the hydrogen arcjet thruster shows a higher plasma temperature in the arc region, and higher axial velocity but lower temperature at the thruster exit. Correspondingly, the hydrogen arcjet thruster has the highest specific impulse and arc voltage for the same inlet stagnant pressure and arc current. The predictions of the modelling are compared favourably with available experimental results. A modelling study is performed to compare the plasma flow and heat transfer characteristics of low-power arc-heated thrusters (arcjets) for three different propellants: hydrogen, nitrogen and argon. The all-speed SIMPLE algorithm is employed to solve the governing equations, which take into account the effects of compressibility, Lorentz force and Joule heating, as well as the temperature- and pressure-dependence of the gas properties. The temperature, velocity and Mach number distributions calculated within the thruster nozzle obtained with different propellant gases are compared for the same thruster structure, dimensions, inlet-gas stagnant pressure and arc currents. The temperature distributions in the solid region of the anode-nozzle wall are also given. It is found that the flow and energy conversion processes in the thruster nozzle show many similar features for all three propellants. For example, the propellant is heated mainly in the near-cathode and constrictor region, with the highest plasma temperature appearing near the cathode tip; the flow transition from the subsonic to supersonic regime occurs within the constrictor region; the highest axial velocity appears inside the nozzle; and most of the input propellant flows towards the thruster exit through the cooler gas region near the anode-nozzle wall. However, since the properties of hydrogen, nitrogen and argon, especially their molecular weights, specific enthMpies and thermal conductivities, are different, there are appreciable differences in arcjet performance. For example, compared to the other two propellants, the hydrogen arcjet thruster shows a higher plasma temperature in the arc region, and higher axial velocity but lower temperature at the thruster exit. Correspondingly, the hydrogen arcjet thruster has the highest specific impulse and arc voltage for the same inlet stagnant pressure and arc current. The predictions of the modelling are compared favourably with available experimental results.
出处 《Plasma Science and Technology》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2010年第6期692-701,共10页 等离子体科学和技术(英文版)
基金 supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.50836007, 10921062)
关键词 low-power arcjet plasma flow and heat transfer numerical modelling propellant-type effects low-power arcjet, plasma flow and heat transfer, numerical modelling,propellant-type effects
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1John R R, Bennett S, Connors J F. 1963, AIAA Journal, 1:2517.
  • 2Todd J P, Sheets R E. 1965, AIAA Journal, 3:122.
  • 3Lichon P G, Sankovic J M. 1996, J. Propulsion and Power, 12:1018.
  • 4Sanchez M M, Miller S A. 1996, J. Propulsion and Power, 12:1035.
  • 5Cappelli M A and Storm P V. 1996, J. Propulsion and Power, 12:1070.
  • 6Auweter-Kurtz M, Glocker B, Golz T, et al. 1996, J. Propulsion and Power, 12:1077.
  • 7Zhang F Y, Fujiwara T, and Komurasaki K. 2001, Applied Optics, 40:957.
  • 8Glocker B, Auweter-Kurtz M, Goelz T M, et al. 1990, Medium power arcjet thruster experiments. Presented at the 21st Int. Electric Propulsion Conf. (Orlando, USA, 1990). AIAA Paper No. 90-2531, America Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Virginia, USA.
  • 9Rhodes R P, Keefer D. 1990, Numerical modeling of an arcjet thruster. Presented at the 21st Int. Electric Propulsion Conf. (Orlando, USA, 1990) AIAA Paper No. 90-2614, America Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Virginia, USA.
  • 10Butler C W, King D Q. 1992, Single and two-fluid simulations of arcjet performance. Presented at the 28th Joint Propulsion Conf. and Exhibit. (Nashville, USA, 1992) AIAA Paper No. 92-3104, America Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Virginia, USA.

同被引文献48

  • 1沈岩,赵文华,石泳,陈黎明.发射光谱测量电弧加热发动机羽流温度[J].推进技术,2005,26(1):72-75. 被引量:6
  • 2汤海滨,刘畅,王海兴,马彬,刘宇.电弧加热发动机结构参数对性能的影响[J].宇航学报,2006,27(5):1063-1067. 被引量:1
  • 3王立军,贾申利,史宗谦,荣命哲.大电流真空电弧磁流体动力学模型与仿真[J].中国电机工程学报,2006,26(22):174-180. 被引量:33
  • 4Butler G W, Cassady R J. Directions for arcjet technology development [J]. J. Propulsion and Power, 1996, 12: 1026-1034.
  • 5Sackheim R L. Overview of united states space propulsion technology and associated space transportation systems [J]. J. Propulsion and Power, 2006, 22: 1310-1333.
  • 6Johnson E O, Malter L. A floating double probe method for measurements in gas discharges [ J ]. Physical Re- view, 1950, 80(1): 58-68.
  • 7Peterson E W, Talbot L. Collisionless electrostatic single- probe and double-probe measurements [ J I. AIAA Jour- nal, 1970, 8(12) : 2215-2219.
  • 8Kirchhoff R H, Peterson E W, Talbot L. An experimental study of the cylindrical langmuir probe response in the transition regime [J]. A1AA Journal, 1971, 9(9) : 1686- 1694.
  • 9Chung P M, Talbot L, Touryan K J. Electric probes in stationary and flowing plasmas: part 1. collisionless and transitional probes [J]. A1AA Journal, 1974, 12(2): 133-144.
  • 10Tao W H, Yasuda H K. Measurement of spatial distribu- tions of electron density and electron temperature in direct cuza'ent glow discharge by double langmuir probes [ J ]. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 2001 , 22 (2) : 297 -311.

引证文献6

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部