期刊文献+

美中贸易逆差与人民币汇率的灰色关联度分析 被引量:2

Gray Relational Analysis of US-China Trade Deficit and RMB Exchange Rate
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用灰色关联度分析方法研究美中经常性贸易逆差与人民币汇率以及美国对华限制出口的相关关系,研究表明:人民币汇率与美中贸易逆差灰色关联度较小,显著小于与美国对华高科技出口限制因素的关联性。因此,不存在我国操纵汇率补贴出口企业保持对美国的贸易高顺差,美中贸易逆差主要是结构性逆差以及美国对华限制性出口政策的结果,人民币升值无益于美中贸易逆差的缩小。 In this paper,we study the correlation among the recurrent trade deficit and RMB exchange rate as well as U.S.restrictions on exports with gray correlation analysis method.The study shows that the correlation between RMB exchange rate and the U.S.trade deficit is small,which was significantly less than the relevance with the U.S.high-tech export.So there is no manipulation of the exchange rate for export enterprises in China to remain high on the U.S.trade surplus.The trade deficit is a structural deficit and the results of U.S.restrictive export policy.RMB appreciation is useless to narrow the U.S.trade deficit.
出处 《西安财经学院学报》 2011年第1期38-41,共4页 Journal of Xi’an University of Finance & Economics
关键词 灰色关联度 人民币汇率 结构性逆差 汇率操纵 Grey relational grade the RMB exchange rate structural deficit currency manipulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献40

  • 1曹乾,何建敏.中美双边贸易不平衡额究竟有多大:1993—2002年的实证分析[J].中国软科学,2004(8):74-78. 被引量:19
  • 2任兆璋,宁忠忠.人民币实际汇率与贸易收支实证分析[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2004,24(11):29-34. 被引量:64
  • 3沈国兵.美中贸易逆差与人民币汇率:实证研究[J].南开经济研究,2004(6):65-71. 被引量:54
  • 4梁碧波.美国对华贸易逆差问题的理论透视[J].广州市经济管理干部学院学报,2005,7(2):21-26. 被引量:6
  • 5[1]Davis, Donald, David Weinstein, 2002. The Mystery of the Excess Trade Balances. American Economic Review, AEA Papers and Proceedings, May 2002, Vol.92, No.2, pp.170-174.
  • 6[3]Frankel, J. A., S.-J. Wei, (1996). ASEAN in a Regional Perspective. Center for International and Development Economic Research Working Paper, C96-074, November.
  • 7[4]Fung, K. C., Lau Lawrence, 1998. The China-United States Bilateral Trade Balance: How Big Is It Really?. Pacific Economic Review, February, 3(1), pp. 33-47.
  • 8[5]Greenspan, Alan, 2003. Greenspan: Pricier Yuan won't help US Trade Deficit. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/en/doc/2003-12/12/content_289670.htm.
  • 9[6]Jialin Zhang, 2000. U.S.-China Trade Issues After the WTO and The PNTR Deal: A Chinese Perspective. Hoover Essays in Public Policy No. 103, Stanford University, 2000.
  • 10[7]Lahreche-Revil, Benassy-Quere,2001. The Impact of Exchange Rate Strategies on Trade and Foreign Direct Investment in China. Paper Presented on China's Economy, Organized by CEPⅡ in Paris on December 12, 2001.

共引文献216

同被引文献20

  • 1石磊,寇宗来.美国的贸易逆差及中美贸易摩擦成因探析[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2004,46(4):23-27. 被引量:34
  • 2卢锋,韩晓亚.长期经济成长与实际汇率演变[J].经济研究,2006,41(7):4-14. 被引量:89
  • 3基金组织国别报告第11/92号:中华人民共和国2011年第四条磋商[R]IMF网站.
  • 4Groenewold N, L He "The US-China Trade Imbalance"Economics Letters[J]. 2007,96 (1).
  • 5Voon J P, Guangzhong L, Ran J. Does China Really Lose from RMB Revaluation? Evidence from Some Export Industries[J]. Applied Economies, 2006,38.
  • 6Cagan, Philip Do Money-Income Causality-A Critical Review of Literature Since the Monetary History,Columbia University Discussion Paper [C]. No. 373, New York: Columbia University, 1989.
  • 7Primiceri G. Time varying structural vector autoregressions and monetary policy[J]. TheReview of Economic Studies, 2005,72(3).
  • 8Nakajima J. Time-varying parameter VAR model with stochastic volatility: An overview of methodology and empirical applications[C]. IMES Discussion Paper, 2011.
  • 9Geweke J. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments. In J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid, and A. F. M. Smith(Eds.), Bayesian Statistics[C] Volume 4. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
  • 10Fung K C, Lau Lawrence. The China-United States bi- lateral trade balance:how big is it really [J]. Pacific Economic Review ,1998(1):33 - 47.

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部