期刊文献+

算子模糊命题逻辑中公式恒真恒假水平的模型 被引量:1

Model generation of formula truth level in propositional operator fuzzy logic
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了在模糊推理中求得公式为真程度的下界和上界,算子模糊逻辑显示使用[0,1]区间中的实数作为算子描述模糊命题的可信程度,其公式的语义值可以在公式的恒真水平和恒假水平之间变动。基于算子模糊命题逻辑,证明了任意公式在二值解释的意义下都可以转化成与之等值的合取范式和析取范式,并根据公式的合取范式或析取范式给出了公式恒真水平和恒假水平模型的生成方法。公式的恒真水平和恒假水平在根本上决定了公式的语义性质,其模型给出了公式在何时达到其最小和最大语义值的一个解答。 To find the upper bound and lower bound for the truth level of the formula in operator fuzzy logic,the uncertainty of a fuzzy proposition is explicitly represented by an operator which is a real number in the interval from 0 to 1.Thus a given formula varies in semantic value from its minimum to its maximum.Based on propositional operator fuzzy logic,the concepts of truth level and false level of a given formula were defined to characterize its minimal and maximal semantic values,and how a formula reached its truth level and false level was discussed.Under the semantics of two-value interpretation,it is shown that the formula can be transformed equivalently to a conjunctive normal form or a disjunctive normal form,so that the model of the truth level and that of the false level can be obtained easily.Then the semantic properties of the formula were clearly determined.
出处 《解放军理工大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI 北大核心 2010年第6期673-675,共3页 Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(60972090)
关键词 算子模糊命题逻辑 公式 恒真水平 恒假水平 模型 propositional operator fuzzy logic formula truth level false level model
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献21

共引文献30

同被引文献14

  • 1Wang H, Deng A. Non-revision reasoning with inconsistent ontology [-C]//10th International Conference on Fuzzy Sys- tems and Knowledge Discovery, 2013 616-620.
  • 2邓安生,何业辉,张卫娜.子句型不一致信念的一种非修正推理方法及其优化[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2014,45(z1):118-123.
  • 3Mary-Anne Williams, Aidan Sims, Steven Kueera. SATEN: An object-oriented web-based revision and extraction engine [J]. Computer Science, 2000.
  • 4Ferme E, Hansson SO. AGM 25 years [J]. Journal of Philo- sophical Logic, 2011, 40 (2): 295-331.
  • 5Williams MA. Iterated theory base change: A computational model [C] //Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Con- ference on Artificial Intelligence, 1995: 1541-1547.
  • 6Liberatore P, Schaerf M. BReLS: A system for the integra- tion of knowledge bases [C] //In Proceedings of Kr, 2000: 145-152.
  • 7Dixon S, Wobcke W. The implementation of a first-order logic AGM belief revision system [C] //5th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, 1993: 40-47.
  • 8Alechina Natasha, Brian Logan, Nguyen Hoang Nga, et al. Resource-hounded alternating-time temporal logic [C] //Pro- ceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2010: 481-488.
  • 9Alechina Natasha, Brian Logan. Belief ascription under bounded resources [J]. Synthese, 2010, 173 (2): 179-197.
  • 10Nguyen HH. Belief revision in a fact-rule Agent's belief base [G]. LNCS 5559: Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Techno- logies and Applications. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009: 120-130.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部