期刊文献+

临床科室医疗工作绩效评价探讨 被引量:6

Research on the evaluation of dinical departments' medical work performance
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探索建立一种以工作量和工作质量为主的临床科室医疗工作绩效考核评价体系。方法采用文献法和多种统计学方法建立指标体系,运用主成分分析法和TOPSIS法进行统计分析,确定涵盖科室社会经济效益、医疗工作总量、人均工作量、工作效率和医疗工作质量5个方面(一级指标)的共26个(非手术科室)或32个(手术科室)二级指标用于评价。结果非手术科室、手术科室的医疗工作绩效综合评价值与各自的月收支结余存在正相关关系,皮尔逊相关系数和秩相关系数分别为0.570、0.427(非手术科室)和0.287、0.566(手术科室)。结论本研究所建立的指标体系和评价结果,可为医院对科室绩效津贴的分配提供参考依据。 Objective To explore and establish an evaluation index system of clinical departments' medical work performance mainly based on workload and the quality of work Methods Literature method and a variety of statistical methods were applied to establish index system, the principal component analysis and TOPSIS method were used to give an statistical analysis. Results There was a positive correlation between the comprehensive evaluation value of medical work performance of non-surgical and surgical departments and the balance of financial revenue and expenditure of the departments. The pearson correlations of these two kinds of departments were 0. 570 and 0. 287 ,and the non-parametric correlations were 0. 427 and 0. 566. Conlusion The index system and evaluation results of this study can provide reference for the allocation of allowances.
作者 谢娟 何钦成
出处 《中华医院管理杂志》 北大核心 2010年第12期942-945,共4页 Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration
关键词 临床科室 医疗工作 绩效评价 Clinical departments Medical work Performance evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献17

  • 1常武.医院业务指标在要素分配中的应用及体会[J].中国卫生经济,2004,23(12):49-49. 被引量:2
  • 2武爱军.实行按生产要素分配新机制的体会[J].中国卫生经济,2004,23(12):63-64. 被引量:1
  • 3张彬,付春生.医疗质量与安全管理[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2006:1.
  • 4江悍平.医疗服务整体管理与质量控制[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:314-328.
  • 5中华人民共和国卫生部.医院评价标准(征求意见稿)[EB/OL].[2009-06-02].http//www.cha.org.cn/GD/uploadimages/gd/files/xwzx/fujian20090602.pdf.
  • 6中华人民共和国卫生部.医院管理评价指南(2008版)[S].卫医发[2008]27号.http://www.moh.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/mohyzs/s3585/200806/36242.html.
  • 7Oliver G,Jutta KHS,Anne F.An international review of projects on hospital performance assessment[J].International Journal for Quality in Health Care,2008,20(3):162-171.
  • 8PATH brochure.WHO.http://www.euro.who.int/document/e89742.pdf.
  • 9Steven P.Hospitals check their charts rankings:push them to improve care[R].The Washington Post.2007.http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/19/AR2007041902735.htmL.
  • 10Sheila D.Rating the rankings:how'top hospital'lists define quality[R].ACP Hospitalist,2007.http://www.acphospitalist.org/archives/2007/04/tophosp.html.

共引文献55

同被引文献64

引证文献6

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部