期刊文献+

超声造影对乳腺癌诊断价值的Meta分析 被引量:12

Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosis of breast cancer:A Meta-analysis
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的采用Meta分析评价超声造影对乳腺癌的临床诊断价值。方法检索Cochrane图书馆、PubMed和中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)文献库中的文献,根据Cochrane协作网筛选与诊断试验方法组推荐的诊断试验纳入标准筛选文献,对文献进行质量评价,并提取纳入研究的特征信息。采用Stata11.0统计软件检验异质性,根据双变量随机效应模型,获得敏感度和特异度均值及其95%可信区间,计算曲线下面积,最后进行敏感性和漏斗图分析。结果共纳入13篇英文文献,研究对象共计745例。纳入研究存在异质性,汇总的敏感度和特异度均值及其95%可信区间为0.89(0.82~0.94)和0.79(0.69~0.87),SROC曲线下面积为0.92(0.89~0.94)。纳入文献稳定性较好,Deeks漏斗图分析提示未见明显发表偏倚(P=0.67)。结论 Meta分析提示,超声造影诊断乳腺癌具有较高的敏感度,但特异度中等,还需要高质量的前瞻性研究以更准确地评价其临床价值。 Objective To observe the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients with primary breast cancers with a Meta-analysis. Methods A comprehensive search in Cochrane Library,PubMed,and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) was performed to identify relevant English and Chinese articles from Jan 1995 to Dec 2009,respectively. According to the criteria for diagnostic research published by the Cochrane Methods Group on Screening and Diagnostic Tests,subsequently,the characteristics of the included articles were appraised and extracted. Statistical analysis was performed with software Stata 11.0 vision. The heterogeneity of the included articles was tested. According to the bivariate random effects model,the mean sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Summary receive operating characteristic (SROC) curve was performed and then the under curve (AUC) was calculated. Finally,the analysis of sensitivity was performed and publication bias was analyzed with certain funnel plot. Results Thirteen of 287 retrieved articles were included,with a total of 745 patients. The included studies had heterogeneity. The mean sensitivity and specificity for CEUS and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.89 (0.82—0.94) and 0.79 (0.69—0.87),respectively. The AUC of SROC was 0.92 (0.89—0.94). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated no disproportionate influences of individual studies. Deeks funnel plot suggested the publication bias was not significant (P=0.67). Conclusion Meta-analysis indicates that CEUS is a valuable diagnostic method which has higher sensitivity but medium specificity in detecting breast cancer. Howerver,more supports from high-quality prospective researches are desired.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第12期2309-2312,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 超声检查 造影剂 META分析 Breast neoplasms Ultrasonography Contrast media Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1The Cochrane methods group on systematic review of screening and diagnostic tests:recommended methods.[2010-7-20].http://www.Cochrane.org/docs/sadtdocl.htm.
  • 2Reitsma JB,Glas AS,Rutjes AW,et al.Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.J Clin Epidemiol,2005,58(10):982-990.
  • 3Moses LE,Shopiro D,Littenberg B.Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a surnmary ROC curve:data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations.Stat Med,1993,12(14):1293-1316.
  • 4Kedar RP,Cosgrove D,McCready VR,et al.Microbubble contrast agent for color Doppler US:effect on breast masses.Work in progress.Radiology,1996,198(3):679-686.
  • 5Huber S,Helbich T,Kettenbach J,et al.Effects of a microbubble contrast agent on breast tumors:computer-assisted quantitative assessment with color Doppler US:early experience.Radiology,1998,208(2):485-489.
  • 6Stuhrmann M,Aronius R,Schietzel M.Tumor vascularity of breast lesions:potentials and limits of contrast enhanced Doppler sonography.AJR Am J Roentgenol,2000,175(6):1585-1589.
  • 7Moon WK,Im JG,Noh DY,et al.Nonpalpable breast lesions:evaluation with power Doppler US and a microbubble contrast agent-initial experience.Radiology,2000,217(1):240-246.
  • 8Yang WT,Metreweli C,Lam PK,et al.Benign and malignant breast masses and axillary nodes:evaluation with echo-enhanced color power Doppler US.Radiology,2001,220(3):795-802.
  • 9Kook SH,Kwag HJ.Value of contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography using a microbubble echo-enhancing gent in evaluation of small breast lesions.J Clin Ultrasound,2003,31(5):227-238.
  • 10Forsberg F,Goldberg BB,Merritt CR,et al.Diagnosing breast lesions with contrast-enhanced 3-dimensional power Doppler imaging.J Ultrasound Med,2004,23(2):173-182.

同被引文献130

  • 1叶兆祥,宋秀宇,肖建宇.CT灌注成像在乳腺良、恶性病变诊断中的应用[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(10):1050-1054. 被引量:43
  • 2王颀,杨剑敏.乳腺癌的现代诊断方法及其评价[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2006,13(3). 被引量:21
  • 3唐健,沈海林.乳腺癌的CT诊断和鉴别诊断[J].苏州大学学报(医学版),2006,26(3):526-527. 被引量:5
  • 4冯赟,刘士远,王晨光,陶晓峰,王金林,王俭.功能MRI在乳腺疾病中的应用[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(5):457-462. 被引量:30
  • 5中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会.中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2007版)[J].中国癌症杂志,2007,17(5):410-428. 被引量:243
  • 6Whiting P,Rutjes AW,Reitsma JB,et al.The develop-ment of QUADAS:a tool for the quality assessment ofstudies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic re-views[J].BMC Med Res Methodol,2003,3:25.
  • 7Whiting P,Rutjes AW,Reitsma JB,et al.Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy:a sys-tematic review[J].Ann Intern Med,2004,140(3):189-202.
  • 8Stavros AT,Thickman D,Rapp CL,et al.Solid breast nodules:use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions[J].Radiology,1995,196(1):123-134.
  • 9Rahbar G,Sie AC,Hansen GC,et al.Benign versus ma-lignant solid breast masses:US differentiation[J].Radiolo-gy,1999,213(3):889-894.
  • 10Zdemir A,Kilic K,Ozdemir H,et al.Contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography in breast lesions:effect on dif-ferential diagnosis after mammography and gray scale sonography[J].J Ultrasound Med,2004,23(2):183-195.

引证文献12

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部