期刊文献+

A perspective study and financial analysis of different protocols of second trimester maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome 被引量:1

A perspective study and financial analysis of different protocols of second trimester maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 Objective:To compare the efficiency and related financial parameters of the double- and triple-marker test for the second-trimester maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome. Methods:The serum samples were collected from the 2^(nd) trimester pregnant women in this hospital and were examined for three biomedical markers[alpha-fetoprotein(AFP),freeβ-human chorionic gonadotropin(freeβ-hCG) and unconjugated estriol(uE_3)]by TR-FIA.The pregnancy outcomes were followed up and screening efficiency calculated for double-marker(AFP+freeβ-hCG) and triple-marker(AFP+ freeβ-hCG+uE_3) test. Results:(1)A total of 4,707 serum samples of 2^(nd) trimester pregnancy were collected in this study,of which 4,245 pregnancy outcomes got followed up by May 30,2009,with 462 cases lost to follow-up.The follow-up rate was 90.2%.3 cases of Down's syndrome,4 cases of other chromosome abnormalities and 1 case of neural tube defect (NTD) were found.There was no medically induced miscarriage by invasive tests.(2) Detection rate and false positive rate of triple marker test for Down's syndrome screening were 66.7%and 5.26%,respectively,while those in double marker test were 33.3%and 4.01%,respectively.The detection rate of all chromosome abnormalities was 75%in triple marker test and 37.5%in double marker test.The detection rate of NTD was 100%either in double or triple marker test.(3) It costs 499,375 RMB to avoid one Down's syndrome birth by using triple marker test and 781,200 RMB by using double marker test. Conclusion:Triple-marker test is superior to double marker test in 2nd trimester maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome,and costs less to avoid a Down's syndrome birth. Objective: To compare the efficiency and related financial parameters of the double- and triple-marker test for the second-trimester maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome. Methods: The serum samples were collected frorh the 2nd trimester pregnant women in this hospital and were examined for three biomedical markers [-alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), free β-human chorionic gonadotropin (free β- hCG) and unconjugated estriol (uE3)] by TR-FIA. The pregnancy outcomes were followed up and screening effi- ciency calculated for double-marker (AFP+ free β-hCG) and triple-marker (AFP+ free β-hCG-t-uE3) test. Results: (1) A total of 4,707 serum samples of 2nd trimester pregnancy were collected in this study, of which 4,245 pregnancy outcomes got followed up by May 30, 2009, with 462 cases lost to follow-up. The follow-up rate was 90.2%. 3 cases of Down's syndrome, 4 cases of other chromosome abnormalities and 1 case of neural tube defect (NTD) were found. There was no medically induced miscarriage by invasive tests. (2) Detection rate and false positive rate of triple marker test for Down's syndrome screening were 66.7% and 5.26%, respectively, while those in double marker test were 33.3% and 4.01%, respectively. The detection rate of all chromosome abnormalities was 75% in triple marker test and 37.5% in double marker test. The detection rate of NTD was 100% either in double or triple marker test. (3) It costs 499,375 RMB to avoid one Down's syndrome birth by using triple marker test and 781,200 RMB by using double marker test. Conclusion: Triple-marker test is superior to double marker test in 2nd trimester maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome, and costs less to avoid a Down's syndrome birth.
出处 《生殖医学杂志》 CAS 2010年第A02期15-19,共5页 Journal of Reproductive Medicine
关键词 唐氏综合征 财务分析 人绒毛膜促性腺激素 血清 筛查 孕妇 透视图 指标测试 Down's syndrome Pregnancy trimester, second Prenatal Screening Pregnant outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献22

  • 1Herffner LJ. Advanced maternal age-how old is too old ? N Engl J Med, 2004,351 : 1927-1929.
  • 2Dommergues M, Audiberl F, Benanar C, et al. Is routine amniocentesis for advanced maternal age still indicated? Fetal Diagn Ther, 2001,16:372-377.
  • 3Benn PA, Egan JFX, Fang M, et al. Changes in the utilization of prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol, 2004,103 : 1255-1260.
  • 4Johnson JP, Streets K, Fitzgerald J, et al. Influence of triplemarker screen risk versus a ptiori risk in decision for amniocentesis in women of advanced maternal age. Prenat Diagn, 1998,18:979- 980.
  • 5Hodges RJ, Wallace EM. Testing for Down's syndrome in the older woman : a risky business? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 46:370-371.
  • 6Wald N J, Rodeek C, Hackshaw AK, et al. First and Second trimester antenatal screening for Down's syndrome: the results of the Serum, Urine and Ultrasound Screening Study (SURUSS) . Health Techol Assess ,2003,7 : 1-77.
  • 7Wald NJ, Rodeck C, Hackshaw AK, et al. SURUSS in perspective. BJOG,2004, l 11:521-531.
  • 8Malone FD, Canick JA, Ball RH, et al. First-trimester or secondtrimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome. New Engl J Med, 2005, 353:2001-2011.
  • 9ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetfician-gynecolostists. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol, 2001,97 : 1-12.
  • 10ACOG Practice Bulletin. Screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol,2007, 109:217-227.

共引文献156

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部