摘要
尽管被告人最后陈述权在立法层面受到重视,但是在实践中被告人并不积极的行使这一权利,最后陈述的内容亦鲜见实质意义。被告人最后陈述权的这种实践样态,与宏观层面的刑事诉讼目的和构造,中观层面的定罪量刑程序模式以及微观层面的被告人最后陈述权保障规则都存在紧密关联。未来被告人如何实践最后陈述权,即取决于此三个制度层面的相应改变。
Although appellee＇s right of final statement（locus standi） is comparatively consummate in legislation,but appellee seems not actively exercise this kind of right in practice,therefore it result in essential-meaningless in content of statement.Such practical status of appellee＇s right of final statement is closely relate with three aspects： the purpose of criminal suit in macroscopic lay,the model of conviction and measurement of penalty measurement in midway,and the juristic rules of appellee＇s right of final statement in microcosm.It reflects shortage of appellee＇s right of final statement in practice,notwithstanding such legal right seems perfect in legal provision.Appellee how to fulfill his right of final statement lies on relevant transform of such three institutional aspects.
出处
《湖南大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第6期131-135,共5页
Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)
关键词
被告人最后陈述权
实践特征
制度根源
appellee＇s right of final statement
practical character
system foundation
