不同分组条件下同侪反馈对学生英语写作的影响被引量：38

An Empirical Study on the Effects of Peer Feedback on ESL Students'Writing in Varying Types of Groups

导出

摘要在实际英语写作教学中,我们会关注在不同二语写作水平的学生中实行同侪反馈活动的可行性问题。本文旨在探讨根据学生的不同水平、不同分组类型对EFL学生的同侪反馈活动以及作文修改效果的影响。本项研究的数据来自于非英语专业4个平行班中48个学生的作文、反馈活动、问卷调查和访谈记录。结果表明:不同类型的分组的确会影响同侪反馈的效果和学生对待同侪反馈的态度。同侪反馈虽然在不同分组情况下都产生有效影响,但是提高程度有高有低,而且不同小组的学生对此活动的态度也有很大出入。 The current study investigated the effects of peer feedback in varying types of groups on ESL students＇writing quality and revisions.The 48 subjects involved in the study were second-year college students from four parallel classes.They were divided,based of their English writing proficiency,into four types of groups in which planned peer feedback was conducted.The study made the following major findings：peer feedback in different dividing-group type did make some influence on the effect of peer feedback and on the subjects＇attitudes towards it;the results of data analyses in these kinds of groups showed that peer feedback worked and was valid in these kinds of groups;but in the respect of the extent of improving writing quality,the effects of peer feedback in different groups were different;and students in different groups expressed their very different attitudes towards the composition of their groups and the peer feedback activity in their groups.

作者高歌

机构地区浙江理工大学

出处《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第6期93-97,共5页 Foreign Language Research

基金浙江理工大学高等教育教学改革研究项目"同侪反馈理论在大学英语写作课改革中的实验性实践(Gn0820)"的阶段性成果

关键词同侪反馈分组类型修改 peer feedback varying types of groups revision

分类号 H319.3 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献19

1杨苗.中国英语写作课教师反馈和同侪反馈对比研究[J].现代外语,2006,29(3):293-301. 被引量：225
2Carson,J.& Nelson,G.Writing Groups:Cross-Cultural Issues[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,1994(3).
3Carson,J.& Nelson,G.Chinese Students Perceptions of ESL Peer Feedback Group Interaction[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,1996(5).
4Caulk,N.Comparing Teacher and Student Responses to Written Work[J].TESOL Quarterly,1994(28).
5Conrad,S.& Goldstein,L.ESL Student Revision after Teacher-written Comments:Text,Contexts and Indivi-duals[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,1999(2).
6Hyland,F.The Impact of Teacher Written Feedback on Individual Writers[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,1998(7).
7Liu,J.& Hansen,J.G.Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classroom[M].Michigan:Michigan University Press,2002.
8Mangelsdorf,K.Peer Feedbacks in the ESL Composition Classroom:What Do the Students Think?[J].ELT Journal,1992(46).
9Mendonca,C.O.& Johnson,K.E.Peer Feedback Nego-tiations:Revision Activities in ESL Writing Instruction[J].TESOL Quarterly,1994(28).
10Mo Junhua.An Exploratory Study of Conducting Peer Feedback among Chinese College Students[J].CELEA Journal,2005(28).

二级参考文献31

1高莉莉.专业英语写作教学中同级讨论的有效性研究[J].太原师范学院学报（社会科学版）,2004,3(3):152-154. 被引量：10
2蒋宇红.在线同伴评价在写作能力发展中的作用[J].外语教学与研究,2005,37(3):226-230. 被引量：123
3Connor, U. & K. Asenavage. 1994. Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision.'? [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 3 : 257-276.
4Conrad, S. & L. Goldstein. 1999. ESL student revision after teacher-written comments: text, contexts and individuals [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 2: 147-179.
5Cortazzi, M. & Jin Lixian 1996. Cultures of learning: Language classrooms in China [A]. In H. Coleman (ed.). Society and the Language Classroom [ C ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6Enginarlar, H. 1993. Student response to teacher feedback in EFL writing [J]. System 21: 193- 204.
7Faigley, L. & S. Witte. 1981. Analyzing revision [J]. College Composition and Communication 32. 400-414.
8Ferris, D. 1995. Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms [J]. TESOL Quarterly 29: 33-53.
9Ferris, D., S. Pezone, C. Tade & S. Tinti. 1997. Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions and implications [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 6: 155-182.
10Gass, S. M. & L. Selinker. 2001. Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course[M]. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Association Publisher.