期刊文献+

PET/CT诊断肺癌的准确度及其证实偏倚校正的研究 被引量:8

The Accuracy of Lung Cancer Diagnosed by PET/CT and the Study of Verification Bias Correction
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:评价正电子发射断层显像(positron emission tomography/computed tomography,PET/CT)诊断肺癌的准确度,分析其证实偏倚校正后的灵敏度及特异度,为临床客观而全面地认识PET/CT诊断的结果提供依据。材料和方法:用最大似然估计值法对PET/CT诊断肺癌的灵敏度和特异度进行校正。结果:传统有偏估计的灵敏度为94.21%(95%CI:90.89%~97.53%),校正证实偏倚后的灵敏度为87.07%(95%CI:81.36%~92.78%),两者95%可信区间有交集,其差异无统计学意义;传统有偏估计的特异度为44.07%(95%CI:31.39%~56.73%),校正证实偏倚后的特异度为65.57%(95%CI:56.82%~74.31%),两者95%可信区间无交集,其差异具有统计学意义,证实偏倚校正后的特异度高于校正前。结论:PET/CT诊断肺癌的灵敏度较高。证实偏倚的存在,影响对PET/CT诊断肺癌的准确度评价。 Purpose To estimate the accuracy of PET/CT for lung cancer and analyze the sensitivity and specificity after the verification of bias correction.To provide the basis for clinical understanding of PET/CT diagnostic results objectively and comprehensively.Materials and Methods Correct the sensitivity and specificity of lung cancer diagnosed by PET/CT using the methods of maximum likelihood estimator.Results The sensitivity of lung caner diagnosed by PET/CT before and after the verification bias been corrected were 94.21%(95%CI:90.89%-97.53%)and 87.07%(95%CI:81.36%-92.78%).The 95%confidence intervals of the sensitivity had intersection,and there were no statistical differences between them.The specificity was increased from 44.07%(95%CI:31.39%-56.73%)to 65.57%(95%CI:56.82%-74.31%)after the verification bias been corrected at the same time,The 95%confidence intervals of them had no intersection,and there were statistical differences between them.Conclusion PET/CT has higher sensitivity for lung cancer.Verification bias can influences on the accuracy of PET/CT in diagnosing lung cancer.
出处 《中国医学影像学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第6期529-531,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging
关键词 肺肿瘤 正电子发射断层显像术 证实偏倚 lung neoplasms; positron-emission tomography; verification bias
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1王荣福,李险峰,张春丽.PET/CT的新进展及临床应用[J].中国医疗器械信息,2007,13(7):1-4. 被引量:29
  • 2Little R,Rubin D.Statistical analysis with missing data.New York:John wiley and Sons,1987,1-371.
  • 3Greenes RA,Begg CB.Assessment of diagnostic technologies:Methodology for unbiased estimation from samples of selective verified patients.Invest.Radio,1985,20(7):751-756.
  • 4Zhou XH.Maximum likelihood estimators of sensitivity and specificity corrected for verification bias.Communications in statistics-Theory and methods,1993,22(11):3177-3198.
  • 5童峰,陈坤,何寒青.优势比在诊断试验评价中的应用[J].中华流行病学杂志,2005,26(10):813-814. 被引量:10
  • 6Zhou XH.Correcting for verification bias in studies of a diagnostic test's accuracy.Statistical Methods in Medical Research,1998,7(4):337-353.
  • 7Coleman RE.PET in lung cancer.J Nucl Med,1999,40(5):814-820.
  • 8李红,张彩霞.PET-CT对肺癌的诊断价值[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2006,17(11):650-653. 被引量:2
  • 9Alonzo TA.Verification bias-corrected estimators of the relative true and false positive rates of two binary screening testes.Statistics in Medicine,2005,24(3):403-417.
  • 10Shig SS,Lee KS,Kim QT,et al.Non-small cell lung cancer:prospective comparison of integrated FDG PET/CT and CT alone for preoperative staging.Radiology,2005,236(3):1011-1019.

二级参考文献66

共引文献48

同被引文献80

引证文献8

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部