期刊文献+

肾移植术后随访中检测受者血清胱抑素C的临床价值 被引量:6

Assessment of glomerular filtration rate in renal transplant recipients using serum cystatin C during follow-up
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨血清胱抑素C(SCys C)浓度检测能否作为肾移植受者随访中移植肾功能测定的理想指标.方法 选择肾移植术后接受长期随访的受者70例,于随访当日检测受者SCys C和血清肌酐(SCr)水平,同时用99mTc-DTPA肾动态显像测定肾小球滤过率(GFR),比较SCys C和SCr与GFR的相关性,并应用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)评价两者在诊断移植肾功能轻度损伤(GFR<1 ml/s)中的效果.结果 随访的肾移植受者中,SCys C和SCr与GFR均呈负相关,相关系数分别为-0.82和-0.66(P<0.01).SCys C用于诊断移植肾功能轻度损伤的敏感度、特异度和阳性预测值(PPV)均高于SCr.SCys C的ROC曲线下面积高于SCr(分别为0.935和0.877),但两者比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 在肾移植术后的随访中,受者SCys C与GFR的相关性比SCr更高,可作为评估移植肾功能的较理想指标. Objective To evaluate whether serum cystatin C (SCys C) could be used as an ideal index to assess renal function of renal transplant recipients during posttransplant follow-up.Methods Seventy patients who were followed up for at least 6 months after renal transplantation in our centre were recruited in the study. SCys C and serum creatinine (SCr) were determined during the follow-up period, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured using an isotope Tc99m DTPA.The correlation between SCys C, SCr and GFR was analyzed. The performance of SCys C and SCr in diagnosing the mild impairment of renal allgraft function (GFR 〈 1 ml/s) was evaluated using ROC curve. Results Both SCys C and SCr had a linear negative correlation with GFR (r = -0. 82 and -0. 66 respectively, P〈0. 01 ). The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values (PPV) of SCys C for diagnosing the mild impairment of renal allgraft function were higher than those of SCr,but the AUC of SCys C did not differ from that of SCr significantly (0. 935 vs. 0. 877, P〉0. 05).Conclusion SCys C could be used an ideal index to evaluate the allograft renal function for its better correlation with actual GFR.
出处 《中华器官移植杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第11期648-650,共3页 Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation
关键词 胱抑素C 肾移植 血清肌酐 肾小球滤过率 Cystatin C Kidney transplantation Serum creatinine Glomerular filtration rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Perrone RD,Madias NE,Levey AS.Serum creatinine as an index of renal function:new insights into old concepts.Cli chem,1992,38(10):1933-1953.
  • 2Dharnidharka VR,Kwon C,Stevens G.Serum cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function:a meta-analysis.Am J Kidney Dis,2002,40(2):221-226.
  • 3Christensson A,Ekberg J,Grubb A,et al.Serum cystatin C is a more sensitive and more accurate marker of glomerular filtration rate than enzymatic measurements of creatinine in renal transplantation.Nephron Physiol,2003,94(2):19-27.
  • 4Risch L,Blumberg A,Huber A.Rapid and accurate assessment of glomerular filtration rate in patients with renal transplants using serum cystatin C.Nephrol Dial Transplant,1999,14(8):1991-1996.
  • 5Keevil BG,Kilpatrick ES,Nichols SP,et al.Biological variation of cystatin C:implications for the assessment of glomerular filtration rate.Clin Chem,1998,44 (7):1535-1539.
  • 6Risch L,BlumbergA,Huber A,et al.Assessment of renal function in renal transplant patients using cystatin C:A comparison to other renal function markers and estimates.Renal Failure,2001,23(3-4):439-448.
  • 7Risch L,Herklotz R,Blumberg A,et al.Eeffects of Glucocorticoid immunosuppression on serum cystatin C concentrations in renal transplant patients.Clin Chem,2001,47(11):2055-2059.
  • 8P(o)ge U,Gerhardt T,Stoffel-Wagner B,et al.Prediction of glomerular filtration rate in renal transplant recipients:cystatin C or modification of diet in renal disease equation? Clin Transplant,2006,20(2):200-205.

同被引文献77

引证文献6

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部