摘要
20世纪40年代末至70年代,印度教与基督教之间的印耶皈依(改教)之辩,是围绕着宪法和相关法律法规的制定而展开的。虽然基督教徒所要求的"宣教权"写进了印度宪法,但印度教属人法,特别是一些邦通过的"宗教自由法",实际上是限制甚至禁止了印度教徒改信基督教。在辩论过程中,基督教方面一再呼吁宗教自由和人权,但在印度教作为主流宗教的大环境下,无论基督教团体如何定义和解释改教,都很难避免与印度教在观念上的冲突。因此,基督教徒致力于让印度教徒改教的行动,也被大多数人认定为有碍印度教徒坚持自己信仰和文化权利,因此有必要从立法的角度加以限制。
From the late 1940s to 1970s,the debate on conversion between Hindu and Christian was around the enactment of constitution and relevant laws and regulations.Although the evangelical right was shrined in the Indian constitution,the Hindu personal law and the religious freedom acts adopted in some states actually restricted or prohibited the conversion of Hindus to Christians.During the debate the Christian repeatedly called for religious freedom and human rights,but it proves hard to avoid the ideological conflict with Hindu in the society where the Hindus are recognized as the mainstream,regardless of the defined rights of Christian groups to convert.Therefore,the action taken by the Christians to proselytize prevented a Hindu from his own belief and cultural rights and should be restricted by legislation.
出处
《南亚研究季刊》
CSSCI
2010年第3期86-91,103,共7页
South Asian Studies Quarterly
基金
教育部人文社科重点研究基地项目<印度教民族主义研究>(项目批准号2007JJDGJW250)资助
