3Ota H,Takase K,Igarashi K,et al.MDCT compared with digital subtraction angiography for assessment of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease importance of reviewing cross:sectional images.AJR,2004,182:201-209.
5Leiner T,Kessels AG,Nelemans PJ,et al.Peripheral arterial disease:comparison of color duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis.Radiology,2005,235(2):699-708.
2Sueyoshi E, Sakamoto I, Matsuoka Y, et al. Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries: comparison of three - dimension dynamic contrast - enhanced subtraction MR angiography and conventional angiography. Radiology 1999;210:683～ 688
3Rubin GD, Schmidt A J, Logan L J, et al. Multi - detector row CT angiography of lower extremity arterial inflow and runoff: initial experience. Radiology 2001;221: 146- 158
4Chow LC, Rubin GD. CT angiography of the arterial system. Radiol Clin N Am 2002;40:729 - 749
5Addis KA, Hopper KD, Lyriboz TA, et al. CT Angiography: in vitro comparison of five reconstruction methods. A JR 2001; 177:1171 - 1176
6Hideki O, Kei T, Kazumasa I, et al. MDCT compared with digital subtraction angiography for assessment of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease: importance of reviewing cross - sectional images. A JR 2004; 182:201 ～ 209
7Hirai T, Korogi Y, Ono K, et al. Prospective evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial artery: combined MR angiography and CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR 2002; 23:93 ～ 101
8吴阶平 裘法祖 黄家驷.外科学第5版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.1396.
9Ota H,Takase k,Igarashi K,etal.MDCT compared with digital subtraction angiography for assessment of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease:importance of reviewing cross-sectioal images.Am J Roentgenol,2004,182(1):201-209.
