期刊文献+

基于PROSPECT+SAIL模型的森林冠层叶绿素含量反演 被引量:32

Estimation of Forest Canopy Chlorophyll Content Based on PROSPECT and SAIL Models
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 森林冠层叶绿素含量直接反映着森林的健康和胁迫情况。叶绿素含量的准确估测,更是研究森林生态系统循环模型的关键。文章以PROSPECT+SAIL模型为基础,从物理机理角度反演森林冠层叶绿素含量。首先利用PROSPECT和SAIL模型模拟叶片水平和冠层水平的光谱,并建立叶片水平叶绿素含量的查找表反演叶片叶绿素含量,然后结合森林结构参数Leaf Area Index(LAI)实现叶片尺度与冠层尺度叶绿素含量的转化,从Hyperion影像反演研究区域冠层水平叶绿素含量。结果表明,叶绿素含量的主要影响波段为400~900nm;PROSPECT模型模拟的叶片光谱和SAIL模型模拟的冠层光谱均与实测光谱拟合效果较好,相对误差分别为7.06%,16.49%;LAI反演结果的均方根误差RMSE=0.5426;利用PROSPECT+SAIL模型可以较好地反演森林冠层叶绿素含量,反演精度为77.02%。 The forest canopy chlorophyll content directly reflects the health and stress of forest.The accurate estimation of the forest canopy chlorophyll content is a significant foundation for researching forest ecosystem cycle models.In the present paper,the inversion of the forest canopy chlorophyll content was based on PROSPECT and SAIL models from the physical mechanism angle.First,leaf spectrum and canopy spectrum were simulated by PROSPECT and SAIL models respectively.And leaf chlorophyll content look-up-table was established for leaf chlorophyll content retrieval.Then leaf chlorophyll content was converted into canopy chlorophyll content by Leaf Area Index(LAI).Finally,canopy chlorophyll content was estimated from Hyperion image.The results indicated that the main effect bands of chlorophyll content were 400-900nm,the simulation of leaf and canopy spectrum by PROSPECT and SAIL models fit better with the measured spectrum with 7.06% and 16.49% relative error respectively,the RMSE of LAI inversion was 0.542 6 and the forest canopy chlorophyll content was estimated better by PROSPECT and SAIL models with precision=77.02%.
机构地区 东北林业大学
出处 《光谱学与光谱分析》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第11期3022-3026,共5页 Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2006AA12Z104)资助
关键词 高光谱遥感 叶绿素含量 HYPERION Hyperspectral remote sensing Chlorophyll content Hyperion
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Gitelson A A, Merzlyak M N, Liehtenthaler H K. Journal of Plant Physiology, 1996, 148: 501.
  • 2Carter G A. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1994, 15: 697.
  • 3Sampson P H, Zarco-Tejada P J, Mohammed G H, et al. Forest Science, 2003, 49(3): 381.
  • 4Datt B. Journal of Plant Physiology, 1999, 154, 30.
  • 5Datt B. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1998, 66: 111.
  • 6Penuelas J, Baret F B, Filella I. Photosynthetica, 1995, 31: 221.
  • 7Blackburn G A. Remote sensing of Environment, 1998, 66: 273.
  • 8Haboudane D, Miller J R, Tremblay N, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 81 . 416.
  • 9Zhang Y Q, Chen J M, Miller J R, et al. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2008, 112(7): 3234.
  • 10Renzullo I. J, Blanehield A L, Guillermin R, et al. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2006, 27(4) : 817.

同被引文献452

引证文献32

二级引证文献193

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部