摘要
有关北宋官窑的研究,目前最为紧要的课题是证明北宋官窑的所在地。对此,大体上有两种说法:一种说法是北宋官窑位于北宋时期的京都汴京,这种说法从北宋官窑研究初期开始就成为了主流;另一种说法则否定了北宋官窑在汴京的说法,指出北宋官窑在当时的汝州。其中,第二种观点的核心依据是《坦斋笔衡》中提及的"京师"与《老学庵笔记》中的"惟用汝器"的解释。作者在本文中对持有第二种观点的依据进行仔细分析,从理论上看,这一观点并不符合逻辑。因此,作者仍然支持北宋官窑位于汴京的观点。
Where the Guan kiln is located remains a mystery in the study of Guan Yao (kilns or wares) of the Northern Song dynasty.There are generally two views as to it: one holds that the location of the kiln is in the capital of Bianjing,which has been the mainstream since the early study of the subject.The other is completely contrary to the first one,which considers Ruzhou the location of the Guan kiln chiefly based on the notes about Jingshi (Bianjing) and Wei Yong Ru Qi (only Ru wares used) which are respectively taken from Tan Zhai Bi Heng and Lao Xue An Bi Ji.The author finally stands by the former point of view as the result of his analyses of the supports for the latter one which were less logically reasonable in his eyes.
出处
《故宫博物院院刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第5期55-72,共18页
Palace Museum Journal
关键词
北宋官窑
京师
汝州
惟用汝器
Guan kiln of the Northern Song dynasty
Jingshi (Bianjing)
Ruzhou
Wei Yong Ru Qi (only Ru wares used)
