摘要
从道路交通秩序领域到市场经济秩序领域、公民个人权利领域、社会管理秩序领域,以危险方法危害公共安全罪的触角已经越伸越长。从交通肇事到生产经营非食品原料、"碰瓷"、偷窨井盖,危险方法行为犯罪行为方式可谓五花八门。以危险方法危害公共安全罪越来越显示出口袋罪的特征。产生这一结果固然有罪名本身的因素,但根本原因在于三个方面:一是对于刑事政策的不合理解读,二是对于社会效果内容的片面阐释,三是无视罪名的确定性内容。其实质是忽视了政策与规范之间的关系,过分关注结果的危害性而淡化了行为规范内容和主观心态。只有在司法中切实坚持罪刑法定原则,才不致使以危险方法危害公共安全罪成为口袋罪。
From road traffic to market economy, individual rights and social governance, endangering public safety with dangerous means has been applied in more and more extensive areas with a variety of relevant criminal acts： traffic violation, production and trade of unedible raw materials,＂ Pengci,＂ and stealing drainage covers, proving itself as an＂ all-inclusive crime. ＂The consequence, of course, may partly result from its name per se, but the main reason lies in ： 1 ） miscomprehension of criminal policy ; 2） one-sided interpretation of so- cial effects ; and 3） ignorance of the specific content of the crime. In fact, the relation between policy and norm is ignored, and the harm of the result is overstressed while the contents of norms and subjective mind are not cared about sufficiently. Only where nullum crimen sine lege is faithfully complied with can endangering public safety stop being an ＂all-inclusive crime. ＂
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第5期70-81,共12页
Modern Law Science
基金
司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目"刑法与刑事政策关系"(09SFB2023)
关键词
以危险方法危害公共安全罪
口袋罪
政策
规范
罪刑法定
endangering public safety with dangerous means
＂all- inclusive crime＂
policy
norm
nul-lure crimen sine lege
