期刊文献+

安慰剂对照与中药临床试验 被引量:14

Placebo control and clinical trial of Chinese medicine
暂未订购
导出
摘要 世界卫生组织正致力于发展安全、有效、实用的传统医药。中医药等替代医学已逐渐得到世界的认可。但其确切疗效有待科学的临床研究加以评估。安慰剂对照与阳性药物对照、空白对照等其他临床试验方法一样,是中药临床试验重要的研究手段之一。本文简要评述了安慰剂对照在临床试验中的意义以及中药临床试验中的安慰剂对照应用现状,并就安慰剂的使用提出了一些初步建议。我们应当强调在人用药品注册技术要求国际协调会(International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use)指导下的科学合理的安慰剂制备以及安慰剂对照研究。科学的临床试验方案可避免后继试验中许多不必要的浪费,并为患者提供真正安全有效的治疗。 World Health Organization aims to develop safe,effective and practical traditional medicine.Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and other complementary and alternative medicine are being recognized in the whole world nowadays.However,the definite effect of Chinese medicine is still in need of scientific research proof.Placebo control is of equal importance to active control and blank control in clinical trial of TCM.This article briefly reviewed the importance of placebo control and commented on its present situation in clinical trial of TCM.This article also brought up the preliminary proposals of placebo application in TCM clinical trial.We should emphasize scientific placebo preparation and good design of placebo-controlled trial,which are directed by International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use.A good clinical trial project will avoid unnecessary wastes and provide safe and effective treatment for people.
作者 吴静
出处 《中西医结合学报》 CAS 2010年第10期906-910,共5页 Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine
关键词 临床试验 安慰剂 中草药 clinical trials placebos drugs Chinese herbal
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Steve Bunk.Is integrative medicine the future? Relman Weil debate focuses on scientific evidence issues.Scientist.1999;13(10):1.
  • 2Walach H.The efficacy paradox in randomized controlled trials of CAM and elsewhere:beware of the placebo trap.J Altern Complement Med.2001;7(3):213-218.
  • 3Steurer-Stey C,Russi EW,Steurer J.Complementary and alternative medicine in asthma:do they work? Swiss Med Wkly.2002;132(25-26):338-344.
  • 4Food and Drug Administration.Guidance for industry:botanical drug products.2004:9-10.
  • 5卞兆祥,David MOHER,Simon DAGENAIS,李幼平,刘良,吴泰相,缪江霞.提高中草药随机对照试验的质量Ⅱ:对照组设计(英文)[J].中西医结合学报,2006,4(2):130-136. 被引量:24
  • 6Liu JP,Zhang M,Wang WY,Grimsgaard S.Chinese herbal medicines for type 2 diabetes mellitus.Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2004;(3):CD003642.
  • 7付娟娟,王刚,毛兵.中医药随机对照试验中安慰剂应用科学性与伦理性评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2008,8(9):781-785. 被引量:22
  • 8Barrett BP,Brown RL,Locken K,Maberry R,Bobula JA,D'Alessio D.Treatment of the common cold with unrefined echinacea.A randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled trial.Ann Intern Med.2002;137(12):939-946.
  • 9Barrett B.Echinacea for the common cold.Ann Intern Med.2003;139(7):601.
  • 10谢宗万.全国中草药汇编.第二版.北京:人民卫生出版社.1996:332,952.

二级参考文献28

  • 1张慧芝.安慰剂在医学中的应用[J].中国医药导报,2006,3(5). 被引量:6
  • 2卞兆祥,李幼平,David MOHER,Simon DAGENAIS,刘良,吴泰相,缪江霞,关家伦,宋丽.提高中草药随机对照试验的质量Ⅰ:临床试验设计和方法学(英文)[J].中西医结合学报,2006,4(2):120-129. 被引量:37
  • 3毛兵,王刚,陈小东,樊涛,刘佳,王蕾,常静,张颖,郭佳,李廷谦.《中国中西医结合杂志》发表随机对照试验报告的质量评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2006,6(4):297-304. 被引量:37
  • 4王雪敏,黄守坚.安慰剂和安慰剂效应[J].新医学,1996,27(12):663-665. 被引量:6
  • 5Miller FG, Short AF. Unnecessary use of placebo controls: the case of asthma clinical trials. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162:1673--1677.
  • 6Linkewich JA, Catalano RB, Flock HL. The effect of packaging and instruction on outpatients compliance with medication regimens. Drug Intelligence and Clinical Pharmacy 1974; 8:10--1ft.
  • 7Moher D, Sehulz KF, Altman D. The CONSORT Statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA 2001; 285 : 1987--1991.
  • 8Huwiler-Muntener K, Juni P, Junker C, et al. Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodologic quality. JAMA 2002; 287:2801--2804.
  • 9Juni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials.BMJ 2001; 323(7303):42--46.
  • 10World Medical Association. Declaration of helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2000 ; 284 : 3043--3045.

共引文献208

同被引文献191

引证文献14

二级引证文献94

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部