期刊文献+

基于“囚徒困境”博弈的防范国企经营者合谋研究 被引量:1

Analysis on Prisoner's Dilemma Game for Preventing Collusion of Executives of State-owned Enterprises
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 如何防范国企经营者和主管部门官员之间合谋侵占国有企业的生产剩余,一直是政府部门和学术界关注的焦点问题。本文根据Laffont和Martimort等在委托-代理框架下提出的分权制思想,构建了防范国企经营者合谋的"囚徒困境"博弈模型。但由于基于"囚徒困境"博弈所构建的双重审核机制可能产生过高的审查成本,且其实施受到主管官员有限责任的限制,因此通过引入不对称信息进一步改进了"囚徒困境"博弈,使不合谋的均衡结果能在更宽松的条件下实现。 Based on the ideas of decentralization brought forward by Laffont Martimort in the principle-agent frame,this paper proposes a model of prisoner's dilemma game to prevent the collusion of executives of state-owned enterprises.However,the double-audit mechanism based on prisoner's dilemma game may result in exorbitant audit cost,and its implement would subject to the restriction of limited liability of officers.Therefore,through introducing asymmetry information,it improves the prisoner's dilemma game,and makes the non-collusion equilibrium achieved in more relaxed conditions.
作者 殷红
出处 《技术经济》 2010年第10期99-102,129,共5页 Journal of Technology Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(10CGLO14) 冶金工业过程系统科学湖北省重点实验室(武汉科技大学)开放基金资助(B201004)
关键词 “囚徒困境”博弈 不对称信息 NASH均衡 国企经营者 prisoner's dilemma game asymmetric information Nash equilibrium executive of state-owned enterprise
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1LAFFONT J J,MARTIMORT D.Collusion under asymmetric information[J].Econometrica,1996,65:875-911.
  • 2FRASCATORE M R.Collusion in a three-tier hierarchy:credible beliefs and pure self-interest[J].Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,1998,34:459-475.
  • 3BAC M.Corruption and supervision costs in hierarchies[J].Journal of Comparative Economics,1996,22:99-118.
  • 4LAFFONT J J,MARTIMORT D.Collusion and delegation[J].Rand Journal of Economics,1998,29:280-305.
  • 5KOFMAN F,LAWARREE J.Collusion in hierarchical agency[J].Econometrica,1993,61:629-656.
  • 6KOFMAN F,LAWARREE J..A prisoner's dilemma model of collusion deterrence[J].Journal of Public Economics,1996,59:117-136.
  • 7GRIMAUD A F,LAFFONT J J,MARTIMORT D.Collusion,delegation and supervision with soft information[J].Review of Economic Studies,2003,70:253-279.
  • 8LAFFONT J J,MARTIMORT D.Separation of Regulators against collusive behavior[J].Rand Journal of Economics,1999,30:232-262.
  • 9MISHRA A.Hierarchies,incentives and collusion in a model of enforcement[J].Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,2002,47:165-178.
  • 10ARIANE L,KONSTANTIN S.Corruption and collusion in procurement tenders[R].Working paper,2003,1-31.

二级参考文献42

共引文献49

同被引文献9

  • 1王金生,王长申,滕彦国.地下水可持续开采量评价方法综述[J].水利学报,2006,37(5):525-533. 被引量:47
  • 2孙晓明.环渤海地区地下水资源可持续利用研究[D]中国地质大学(北京),中国地质大学(北京)2007.
  • 3Bergstrom C T,Stark O.How Altruism Can Prevail in an Evolutionary Environment. The American Economist . 1993
  • 4Christoph H,Michael D.Spatial Structure Often Inhibits the Evolu-tion of Cooperation in the Snow Drift Game. Nature . 2004
  • 5Wu J X,Yang Z C.Synchronization In Agents Harvesting Game With Regional Nature. The22th Chinese Control and Decision Con-ference . 2010
  • 6Nowak MA,May RM.Evolutionary games and spatial chaos. Nature . 1992
  • 7Kaneko K.Spatiotemporal chaos in one-and two-dimensional coupled map lattices. Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena . 1989
  • 8罗卫东,程奇奇.社会仿真研究:中国社会科学跨越式发展的可能路径[J].浙江社会科学,2009(2):2-7. 被引量:11
  • 9林祚顶.我国地下水开发利用状况及其分析[J].水文,2004,24(1):18-21. 被引量:21

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部