摘要
为了从整体上描述那些从外观看来相同或相似的一类大宗瓷器,学者们使用了窑系一词,然而随着现代考古学的发展,尤其是陶瓷考古的不断完善,学者们对窑系一词的异议逐渐增多。本文在综述前人已有成果基础上提出了自己的观点:用窑系一词概括生产从外观看来相同或相近的一类大宗瓷器的做法不妥,用类型一词概括那些从外观看来相同或相近的一类大宗瓷器,用窑系一词概括那些生产时间长、占地面积大、相同时间生产产品特征相同、邻近朝代具有明显继承关系的一系列古窑似乎更为妥当。
in order to describe those overall appearance same or similar kind porcelain, scholars use the word kiln, however with the development of modem archaeology, especially ceramic archaeological, scholars object the word kiln gradually. Based on reviewing the preciously existing results, ! think use the word type to describe those porcelain overall appearance same or similar kind is better than the word kiln. Use the word kiln to describe the ancient kilns product long time. cover big area, the same time product characteristics, neighboring dynasties has obvious a series of inheriting relationship more appropriate.
出处
《南方文物》
2010年第3期115-119,共5页
Cultural Relics in Southern China
