期刊文献+

舒芬太尼和芬太尼复合麻醉下常温冠状动脉旁路移植术患者应激反应的比较 被引量:1

暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:比较舒芬太尼和芬太尼复合麻醉下常温冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的应激反应及应用中的安全性和有效性。观察舒芬太尼在非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术应用中的安全性和有效性。方法:择期行OPCABG病人40例,随机分成两组,舒芬太尼组和芬太尼组,每组2 0例,麻醉诱导应用咪达唑仑(0.04~0.05)mg/kg,依托咪酯(0.16~0.2)mg/kg,维库溴铵(0.1~0.12)mg/kg同时分别静注舒芬太尼(0.5~1)μg/kg,或芬太尼4~8μg/kg,同时持续输注丙泊酚4~6 mg/(hr.kg),舒芬太尼0.08μg(min.kg),或芬太尼0.6μg/(min.kg)维持麻醉。记录各组气管插管、切皮、劈胸骨、穿钢丝和拔除气管导管各时间的平均压和心率。结果:在气管插管过程中,浅麻醉反应的病人数舒芬太尼组明显低于芬太尼组,在气管插管、切皮、劈胸骨、穿钢丝和拔管期间,芬太尼组收缩压、舒张压明显高于舒芬太尼组,术后清醒和拔管及ICU滞留时间两组病人差异无统计学意义。结论:舒芬太尼能提供术中更稳定的血液动力学,麻醉效果优于芬太尼,而且不影响术后清醒和拔管及ICU滞留时间。
出处 《内蒙古医学杂志》 2010年第8期939-941,共3页 Inner Mongolia Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献12

  • 1Ropcke H, Konen Bergmann M, Cuhls M, et al. Propofol and remifentanil pharmacedynamic interaction during orthopedic surgical procedures as measured by effects on bispectral index. J Clin Anesth,2001,13:198-207.
  • 2Vuyk J. Clinical interpretation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic propofol-opioidinteractions. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg, 2001,52: 445-451.
  • 3Lentschener C, Ghimouz A, Bonnichon P, et al. Remifentanil-propofol vs sufentanil-propofol: optimal combinations in clinical anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2003,47:84-90.
  • 4Schnider TW, Minto CF, Gambus PL, et al. The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers. Anesthesiology, 1998,88: 1170-1182.
  • 5Schnider TW, Minto CF, Shafer SL, et al. The influence of age on propofol pharmacokinetics. Anesthesiology, 1999,90: 1502-1516.
  • 6Geptes E, Sharer SL, Camu F, et al. Linearity of pharmacokinetics and model estimation of sufentanil. Anesthesiology, 1995,83: 1194-1204.
  • 7Hoymork SC, Raeder J, Grimsmo B, et al. Bispectral index, predicted and measured drug levels of target-controlled infusions of remifentanil and propofol during laparoscopie cholecystectomy and emergence. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2000, 44:1138-1144.
  • 8White M, Schenkels MJ, Engbers FH, et al. Effect-site modelling of propofol using auditory evoked potentials. Br J Anaesth, 1999,82: 333-339.
  • 9Bailey JM, Mora CT, Shafer SL, et al. Pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult patients undergoing coronary revasculization. The multicenter study of perioperative ischemia group. Anesthesiology, 1996,84: 1288-1297.
  • 10Barvais L, Rausin I, Glen JB, et al. Administration of propafol by targrt-conteoUed infusion in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Aneth, 1996,10: 877-883.

共引文献47

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部