期刊文献+

老年患者经桡动脉途径行介入检查及治疗技术障碍分析和安全性评价

暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的总结45例患者经桡动脉进行冠状动脉造影检查(CAG)及介入治疗(PCI)的经验。分析存在的技术难点、相应解决办法及安全性评价。方法 45例患者经桡动脉行CAG(男性38例,女性7例),平均年龄(65±10)岁,常规使用5F泰尔茂公司多功能导管,7例更换6F指引导管成功进行PCI,其中男性6例,女性1例,平均年龄(66±7)岁。结果桡动脉穿刺不成功2例,桡动脉痉挛导致无法完成操作1例(5F造影导管),经桡动脉途径成功率为93.3%(42/45),其中1例改为经肱动脉途径成功施行PCI,2例改为经股动脉途径完成CAG和PCI操作。结论老年患者采用桡动脉径路行冠状动脉造影及冠状动脉介入治疗是安全的,可提高患者的依从性,减少患者的一些潜在并发症的发生,但较经股动脉径路操作稍复杂,需掌握相应的操作技巧及器械选用策略。
出处 《中国医药指南》 2010年第29期95-96,共2页 Guide of China Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Smith SC,Dove JT,Jacobs AK,et al.ACC/AHA guidelines of percutaneous coronary interventions(revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)22 executive summary.A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Hcart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines(committeeto revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty)endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Inten,cotions[J].J Am Coil Cardiol,2001,37(8):2215-2239.
  • 2周国伟,何奔,孙宝贵.急性心肌梗死溶栓后介入治疗的现状[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2002,10(3):162-164. 被引量:18
  • 33] Marco J,Biomino G,Fajadet J,et al.The Pads cour onRevascularization[M].Pads:Europa Edition,2000:1-33.
  • 4Wu SS,Galani RJ,Bahro A,et al.8 French transradialcoronary interventions:clinical outcome and late effects on the radial artery and hand function[J].J lnvasive Cardiol,2000,12(12):605-609.
  • 5Cox N,Resnic FS,Popma JJ,et al.Corn parison of the risk of vascular complications associated with femoral and radial access coronary atheterizationprocedures in obese versus nonobese patients[J].Am J Cardiol,2004,94(9):1174-1177.

二级参考文献17

  • 1[1]Simes RJ, Topol EJ, Holmes DRJ, et al. Link between the angiographic substudy and mortality outcomes in a large randomized trial of myocardial repeffusion: importance of early and complete infarct artery reperfusion. Circulation, 1995,91:1923-1928.
  • 2[2]Zijistra F, de Boer MJ, Hoomtje JCA, et al. A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Eng J Med, 1993,328:680-684.
  • 3[3]Ellis SG, Ribero da SE, Heyndrickx G, et al. Randomized comparison of rescue angioplasty with conservative management of patients with early failure of for acute anterior myocardial infarction. Circulation,1994,90:2280-2284.
  • 4[4]TIMI Study Group. Immediate vs delayed catheterization and angioplasty for early following thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction:TIMI IIA results. JAMA, 1988,260:2849-2858.
  • 5[5]Reiner JS, Lundergan CF, Fung A, et al. Evolution of early TIMI 2flow after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: GUSTO-1Angiographic Investigators. Circulation, 1996,94:2441-2446.
  • 6[6]Ellis SG, Lincoff AM, George BS, et al. Randomized evaluation of coronary angiography for early TIMI 2 flow after thrombolytic therapy for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: a new look at an old study. Coron Artery Dis, 1994,5:611-615.
  • 7[7]Braunwald E, Cannon CP, McCabe CH. An approach to evalulating thriombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: the "unsatisfactory outcome" end point. Circulation, 1992,86:683-687.
  • 8[8]McKendall GR, Antman EM, Braunwald E, et al. What is the clinical outcome and impact of revascularization of TIMI 2 flow following acute myocardial infarction? J Am Coll Candiol, 1997,29:389A.
  • 9[9]Scutton AGC, Campell PG, Grech ED, et al. Failure of thrombolysis:experience with a policy of early angiography and rescue angioplasty for electrocardiographic evidence of failed thrombolysis. Heart, 2000, 84:197-204.
  • 10[10]Ross AM, Coyne KS, Reiner JS, et al. A randomized trial comparing primary angioplasty with a stragety of short-acting thrombolysis and immediate planned rescue angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction:the PACT trial. JACC, 1999,34:1954-1962.

共引文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部