企业政治战略与经济绩效:基于合法性视角被引量：24

Relations between Political Strategies and Economic Performance of Enterprises in Transitional Economy: The Mediating Effect of Legitimacy

原文传递

导出

摘要本文从合法性视角分析了我国企业政治战略对其经济绩效的影响,实证研究结果表明:在不考虑合法性作用下,企业交易型、关系型政治战略对于经济绩效的提升具有积极显著作用;引入合法性变量后,企业交易型、关系型政治战略均对合法性产生影响,合法性又直接作用于经济绩效,从而在政治战略促进经济绩效提升的过程中,合法性发挥着中介作用;不同规模与性质的企业通过政治战略实现经济绩效的路径具有显著性差异。企业在实施政治战略实现经济绩效的过程中,不应以牺牲合法性为代价来实现经济绩效。 This paper explores the impact of political strategies upon economic performance of Chinese enterprises from legitimacy perspective. The results of the empirical study are as follows. Firstly, enterprises＇ transactional and relational political strategies have positive effect upon economic performance without considering legitimacy. Secondly, after introducing the variable legitimacy, both transactional and relational political strategies influence performance significantly. Legitimacy has direct impact upon economic performance, and thus legitimacy plays the mediating role in the process of enhancing economic performance through implementation of political strategies. Thirdly, the path for enterprises with different sizes and characteristics to achieve economic performance through political strategies is significantly different. Lastly, enterprises should not sacrifice legitimacy for economic performance in the process of implementing political strategies.

作者熊会兵肖文韬邓新明

机构地区中南财经政法大学工商管理学院中南民族大学管理学院武汉大学经济与管理学院

出处《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第10期138-147,共10页 China Industrial Economics

基金教育部人文社会科学项目"转型期企业竞争互动及其资源基础与绩效影响:基于非市场视角"(批准号09YJC630177) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目"转型时期企业整合战略实施的决策机制研究"(批准号7082003)

关键词政治战略合法性经济绩效战略管理 political strategies legitlmacy economic performance strategic management

分类号 F270.3 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献40

1Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. Learning from Successful Local Private Firms in China: Establishing Legitimacy [J]. Academy of Management Executive, 2001,15(4).
2Baron D. Integrated Strategy: Market and Non-market Component[J]. California Management Review, 1995, (37).
3Cattell, R,B. The Meaning and Strategic Use of Factor Analysis [A]. Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology[C]. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966,.
4Cone, Inc. Corporate Citizenship Study: The Role of Cause Branding: Executive Summary[R]. Boston: 2002.
5Dacin, Tina, Christine Oliver, and Roy, Jean-Paul. The Legitimacy of Strategic Alliances: An Institutional Perspective[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2007, (28).
6Deephouse, D. Does Isomorphism Legitimate[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, (39).
7Epstein, E. The Corporation in American Politics[M]. NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1969.
8Getz, K. A. Research in Corporate Political Action[J]. Business & Society, 1997, 36(1).
9Hillman A., and Hitt M. Corporate Political Strategy Formulation: A Model of Approach, Participation and Strategy Decisions[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995, ~2d).
10Hillman, A., Zardkoohi, A., and Bierman, L. Corporate Political Strategies and Firm Performance: Indications of Firm-Specific Benefits from Personal Service in the US Government [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, (20).