摘要
单纯的不当得利发生地法主义,即以不当得利发生地为唯一空间连结因素的双边冲突规范,就立法沿革而言,只是个过时的立法主流;就立法模式而言,此项立法主义属传统冲突规范范畴,故带有传统规范自身无法克服的僵硬封闭之缺陷,需要借助共同属人法、法院地法、原因关系准据法来软化;而就其内涵而言,"不当得利发生地"这样的表达不够准确,其指向的连结点可以是损害发生地、利益获得地和原因事实发生地,而原因事实发生地最为合理。不当得利冲突规则至今在我国尚属立法空白,因此厘清不当得利发生地之内涵,并软化该连结点后,此项主义可为我国立法所用。
Pure Lex Loci Conditionis refers to the locus where unjust enrichment takes place as the sole connecting factor in space for the bilateral conflict.As far as the history of legislation is concerned,it is an old-fashioned legislative mainstream;as for model of legislation,Pure Lex Loci Conditionis is categorized as traditional conflict rule carrying with itself some defects like rigidness and closedness which need to be softened by Lex Patriae Debitoris,Lex Fori and Lex Causa Condictionis.In the case of its meaning,the interpretation of ＂the place where unjust enrichment takes place＂ is not precise,as its directional connection can be understood as the place place where the loss occurs,the place of enrichment and the place where the cause factor occurs.And the place where the cause factor occurs should be prevailing.Since there is no conflict rule of unjust enrichment in P.R.C.,the meaning of the place where unjust takes place must be made clear.Lex Loci Conditionis can be adopted in China＇s legislation after its connection has been softened.
出处
《浙江工商大学学报》
2010年第5期13-19,共7页
Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University
基金
国家"211工程"三期重点学科建设项目"转型期法治的理论
制度与实证研究"阶段性成果之一
关键词
不当得利
准据法
发生地法
软化
原因事实
unjust enrichment
application of law
lex loci conditionis
soften
cause factor
