期刊文献+

阴道助产掌助产的临床应用分析 被引量:7

Clinical application and analysis on palm for assisted vaginal delivery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:应用一种新的阴道助产技术——阴道助产掌术并评估其在阴道助产中的价值。方法:介绍阴道助产掌并对2008年1月~2009年6月应用阴道助产掌分娩的50例与同期间应用产钳助产及胎头吸引助产各50例进行比较分析,比较阴道助产掌与自然分娩及其他阴道助产方法对母儿损伤的情况。结果:阴道助产掌组产后出血量及软产道损伤例数较产钳组显著减少(P<0.05),但助产掌组的单次助产成功率90%低于产钳组的100%,而与胎头吸引组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);阴道助产掌组的新生儿损伤发生率显著低于产钳组及胎头吸引组(P<0.05)。结论:阴道助产掌助产是一种安全有效、操作简单、易于掌握、助产快、母婴损伤小的新的助产技术,在一定条件下可以代替产钳术,但单次助产成功率低于产钳术,可取代胎头吸引术,值得临床推广应用。 Objective:To apply a new assisted vaginal delivery technique-palm for assisted vaginal delivery and evaluate its value in assisted vaginal delivery.Methods:50 cases applying palm for assisted vaginal delivery and 50 cases applying forceps delivery and vacuum extraction of fetal head were analyzed and compared from January 2008 to June 2009,the damage of palm for assisted vaginal delivery,spontaneous delivery and the other assisted vaginal delivery methods to mothers and infants were compared.Results:The volume of postpartum hemorrhage and the number of soft birth canal laceration in palm for assisted vaginal delivery group were significantly lower than those in forceps delivery group (P 0.05),but the single success rate of palm for assisted vaginal delivery group (90%) was significantly lower than that of forceps delivery group (100%),there was no significant difference between palm for assisted vaginal delivery group and vacuum extraction of fetal head group (P 0.05) ;the incidence of neonatal injury in palm for assisted vaginal delivery group was significantly lower than those in forceps delivery group and vacuum extraction of fetal head group (P 0.05).Conclusion:Obstetric palm for assisted vaginal delivery is a safe,effective,simple,easy to grasp,quick and minimally invasive and new technique in assisted vaginal delivery,which can replace forceps delivery under certain conditions,but the single success rate is significantly lower than that of forceps delivery,and it can replace vacuum extraction of fetal head,which is worth clinical popularizing.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第29期4288-4290,共3页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
基金 广州市新技术新项目推广应用资助项目(2008-XZL-18)
关键词 助产掌 阴道助产 母儿损伤 Obstetric palm Assisted vaginal delivery Injury of mothers and infants
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Verity Let al. Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour. A cohort study [J]. Lancet, 2001, 358:1203.
  • 2信玉山.新生儿颅内出血34例分析[J].中国优生优育(1990-2002上半年),2001,12(2):76-76. 被引量:3
  • 3刘慧姝,陈敦金,张红霞,郑峥.阴道助产掌临床应用研究[J].实用医学杂志,2007,23(20):3175-3177. 被引量:8
  • 4Caughey AB, Sandberg PL, Zlatnik MG et al. Forceps compared with vacuum rates of neonatal maternal morbidity[J]. J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 106 (5 Pt 1): 908.
  • 5Damron DP, Capeless EL. Operative vaginal delivery of forceps and vac- uum for success rate and risk of rectal sphincter injury [J] . J Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 191 (3): 907.

二级参考文献7

  • 1Damron D P,Capeless E L.Operative vaginal delivery:a comparison of forceps and vacuum for success rate and risk of rectal sphincter injury[J].J Obstet Gynecol,2004,191(3):907-910.
  • 2Johanson R B.RCOG[M].London:"Green Top" Guideline,2005:53-60.
  • 3Hayashi R,James D K,Steer P J,et al.Assisted vaginal delivery[M].Philadelphia:Elsevier Saunders,2005:1514-1530.
  • 4Cunningham F G,Norman F,Larry C,et al.Williams obstetrics[M].Wenstrom:McGraw-Hill,2002:485-508.
  • 5Demissie K,Rhoads G G,Smulian J C,et al.Operative vaginal delivery and neonatal and infant adverse outcomes:population based retrospective analysis[J].BMJ,2004,329(7456):24-29.
  • 6Caughey A B,Sandberg P L,Zlatnik M G,et al.Forceps compared with vacuum rates of neonatal maternal morbidity[J].J Obstet Gynecol,2005,106(5 Pt 1):908-912.
  • 7Johnson J H,Figueroa R,Garry D,et al.Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries[J].J Obstet Gynecol,2004,103(3):513-518.

共引文献9

同被引文献50

引证文献7

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部