摘要
村规民约既承载着实现村民自治的宪法使命,同时又具有解决乡村民事纠纷的"私法"功能。在民事审判中,它往往是法院用来解决民事纠纷的事实上的依据。在基本权利适用于民事审判的背景下,村规民约与基本权利二者之间往往存在着逻辑上的关联,该种关联由以存在的共性场景是法律缺位。在该共性场景之下,二者在民事审判中的适用不存在绝对的先后次序,而是呈现出一种平行的、互动的外在面向。村规民约与基本权利在民事审判中不可能直接适用,它们适用的共同管道是公序良俗原则。
The village regulations bear the constitutional mission of implementing the villager self-government,furthermore,they can be used to solve the country civil disputes.Because the village regulations and the fundamental rights are all used in civil trial,naturally,the logical connection is built between them.The common background supporting the connection is law vacancy.Under the common background,their application in civil trial has no priority,on the contrary,they present a parallel,interactive external fronts.They can not be directly applied in civil trial,their common applying duct is the principle of public order and good customs.
出处
《中国人民大学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第5期102-111,共10页
Journal of Renmin University of China
基金
教育部哲学社会科学一般项目(07JA820019)
复旦大学亚洲研究中心资助项目
关键词
民事审判
村规民约
基本权利
civil trial
village regulation
fundamental right
