期刊文献+

照顾者虐待老年人评估量表(中文版)的信度和效度测评 被引量:26

Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Caregiver Abuse Screen for Eldely Patients
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的测评照顾者虐待老年人评估量表(中文版)的信度和效度。方法翻译国外的照顾者虐待老年人评估量表,调查广州市2所三级甲等医院老年患者的照顾者132名,并抽取其中20名进行重测。结果量表的内部一致性信度Cronbach’sα系数为0.77,重测Spearman相关系数为0.541(P<0.05),配对t检验显示两次测量间差异无统计学意义。因子分析提取3个公因子,累计贡献率为65.471%,各项目在相应因子上有较满意的因子载荷量(>0.4)。结论照顾者虐待老年人评估量表(中文版)的信度与效度良好,项目设置适用于初步筛查和评估老年人照顾者是否存在虐待老年人的危险倾向。 Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the caregiver abuse screen(CASE) for the elderly.Methods The original edition of CASE was translated from English into Chinese.A total of 132 caregivers of the elderly in two Grade-Ⅲ Level A hospitals were investigated and 20 cases were selected for repeated testing with the CASE.Results The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of CASE was 0.77.Test-retest Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.541(P0.05).The paired t-test showed no significant difference between the two measurement(P0.05).Three public factor were extracted with factor analysis,which accounted for the total variance of 65.471%,and the corresponding factors of the projects were satisfied in amount of factor loading(0.4).Conclusion The Chinese version of the CASE was demonstrated with good reliability and validity.The setting of its items can be applied to the initial screening and the assessment of whether the caregiver of the elderly have a risk tendency of elder abuse.
出处 《解放军护理杂志》 2010年第17期1290-1292,共3页 Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
关键词 照顾者 虐待 老年人 量表 信度 效度 caregivers abuse the elderly scale reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Selwood A,Cooper C.What is elder abuse-who decides?[J].Int J Geriatr Psychiatry,2007,22(10):1009-1012.
  • 2Reis M,Nahmiash D.Validation of the caregiver abuse screen[J].Can J Aging,1995,14(Suppl 2):45-60.
  • 3Paixǎo C M Jr,Reichenheim M E,Moraes C L,et al.Cross-cultural adaptation to Brazil of the instrument caregiver abuse screen(CASE) for detection of abuse of the elderly by caregivers[J].Cad Saude Publica,2007,23(9):2013-2022.
  • 4Baker A A.Granny battering[J].Mod Geriatr,1975,5:20-24.
  • 5Fulmer T,Paveza G,Vandeweerd C,et al.Neglect assessment in urban emergency departments and confirmation by an expert clinical team[J].J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci,2005,60(8):1002-1006.
  • 6Schofield M J,Mishra G D.Validity of self-report screening scale for elder abuse:Women's health australia study[J].Gerontologist,2003,43(1):110-120.
  • 7Fulmer T,Paveza G,Abraham I,et al.Elder neglect assessment in the emergency department[J].J Emerg Nurs,2000,26(10):436-443.
  • 8Fulmer T,Guadagno L,Bitondo Dyer C,et al.Progress in elder abuse screening and assessment instruments[J].J Am Geriatr Soc,2004,52(2):297-304.
  • 9Meeks-Sjostrom D.A comparison of three measures of elder abuse[J].J Nurs Scholarsh,2004,36(3):247-249.

同被引文献199

引证文献26

二级引证文献175

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部