期刊文献+

从官诬闹漕案看清代地方官漕政理念与地方社会治理——以陆名扬闹漕为中心的考察 被引量:7

Exploring the local officials' attitudes toward water carrier collection and administration of local society through the trumped-up cases in the Qing Empire——an investigation centered on a caozheng case filed by Lu Ming-yang
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 地方官,作为清代漕粮征派在地方社会的代理人,其财政理念、办漕态度与对国家政策执行的差异性直接影响漕粮征派在地方社会的进行。在清代漕政制度存在缺陷的情况下,不法州县官不时擅用制度缺陷,运用种种策略与绅衿周旋争利,不同的社会治理思想亦对漕案的兴起、发展、善后产生影响,从而决定地方社会秩序状况。本文以陆名扬闹漕为典型个案,考察地方官对漕粮征派的执行情况及其对地方社会秩序的影响,揭示清嘉道时期漕案频发、官民冲突加剧的内在原因,以及地方社会的应对策略和效果。 As agents of Qing government,local officials of the eight provinces that arrange the shipment of grain taxes by water are responsible for the running situation of water carrier collection. It is both the attitude taken by the local officials towards the management of their office and their rationale behind the exercise of their power that dictated how such incidents took place and were resolved. Because of the system defect and water transport crisis,illegal officials usually make free with the system defect and use various strategies to fight against the gentles,so that they can pursue more selfish interests. As a result,the marked discrepancies in the individual quality of the local officials not only dictated how caozheng cases took place and were resolved,but also influenced the local society order greatly. Lu Ming-yang incident,which took place in the middle Qing Dynasty,provides a first-hand observations to analysis how the local officials influence the running situation of water carrier collection and local society order. Besides that,this case also reveals the intrinsic reasons why caozheng cases happen more frequently and the conflicts between the officials and peoples were becoming fiercely during the Jiaqing and Daoguang Dynasty.
作者 肖丽红
机构地区 厦门大学历史系
出处 《安徽史学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第5期5-15,共11页 Historical Research In Anhui
关键词 地方官 漕政理念 地方社会治理 陆名扬闹漕 local officials attitudes toward water carrier collection administration of local society the Lu Ming-yang caozheng incident
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1《赠观察沈君家传》,沈衍庆.《槐卿遗稿》卷6《杂著》,清同治元年刊本.
  • 2《谕各乡贤后裔清完钱粮》,沈衍庆.《槐卿政绩》卷1《示谕》,清同治元年刊本.
  • 3《复李石梧制军》,吴养原编.《吴文节公遗集》卷64《尺牍》,清咸丰七年刻本.
  • 4《为漕米既经改折滥派应加剔厘事》,胡文学.《疏稿》(选录),中国社会科学院历史研究所清史研究室编.《清史资料》,第3辑,中华书局1982年版,第136页.
  • 5《征收钱粮禁止截串发差》,《江苏省例续编》,光绪元年季夏月江苏书局刊.
  • 6陈宏谋.《与各属论治》,贺长龄编.《皇朝经世文编》.
  • 7林则徐.《议覆筹划漕运事宜疏》,盛康编.《皇朝经世文续编》,卷48,户政20,光绪23年思刊楼刊刻.
  • 8包世臣.《庚辰杂著三》,《中衢一勺》卷3.
  • 9王岂孙.《转般私议》,贺长龄编.《皇朝经世文编》卷47《户政二十二》,清光绪十七年上海广百宋齐桥印.
  • 10《批临潼县禀》,樊增祥.《樊山政书》卷18,清宣统二年刊本.

共引文献8

同被引文献226

引证文献7

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部