期刊文献+

对博弈论公设的质疑 被引量:1

Doubt on Public Pre-assumptions in Game Theory
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 "理性人"和公共知识是博弈论中的两个公设,即假设博弈局中人都是理性的,在公共知识的背景下选取行为策略,使自己的效用达到最大化。然而,正是从这样的假设前提出发,却使博弈理性推理陷入困境,"理性人"不理性。因此,符合逻辑的是对博弈论公设产生质疑。 "Rational agent" and common knowledge are two public pre-assumptions in game theory, which assume that players in game are rational, and choose action strategy against a background of common knowledge to maximize utility. However, it consequentially puts rational reasoning in a dilemma, and "rational agent" is reasonless. Logically, what we can do is to throw doubt on public pre-assumptions in game theory.
作者 蒋正峰
出处 《天津商业大学学报》 2010年第5期37-39,共3页 Journal of Tianjin University of Commerce
基金 国家社会科学基金"经济逻辑研究"(06BZX050)
关键词 理性 公共知识 集体理性 个体理性 rationality common knowledge collective rationality individual rationality
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Bermudez L. Rationality and the Backwards Induction Argument [ J ]. Analysis, 1999,59 (4) :243 - 248.
  • 2蒋正峰.博弈推理中"理性人"的困惑[J].广东教育学院学报,2003,23(1):75-78. 被引量:2
  • 3Butts, Hintikka. Advances in Understanding Rational Behavior [ C ]//Reidel D. Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Part II. Holland : Dordrecht, 1977:315 - 343.
  • 4Auman R. Agreeing to disagree [ J ]. The Annals of Statistics, 1976(4) :1236 - 1239.
  • 5Auman R, Brandenburger A. Epistemic Conditions for Nash Equilibrium [ J ]. Econometrica, 1995,63 : 1161 - 1180.
  • 6Pettit P, Sugden R. The Backward Induction Paradox [J]. The Journal of Philosophy, 1989,86 : 182.
  • 7Schick F. Supprise, Self-knowledge, and Commonality [J]. The Journal of Philosophy, 2000 ( 8 ) :448 - 449.
  • 8黄涛.豪尔绍尼评传[M].太原:山西经济出版社,1999.
  • 9Weirich P. Equilibrium and Rationality [ M ].黄涛,译.北京:经济科学出版社,2000.

共引文献3

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部