期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

基于两种句法分析的语义角色标注比较研究 被引量：2

ON COMPARISON OF SEMANTIC ROLE LABELLING BASED ON TWO TYPES OF SYNTACTIC PARSING
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 首先介绍了短语结构句法树和依存树,比较了两者的差别。然后通过构建基于短语结构句法分析和基于依存句法分析的两个不同的语义角色标注系统,在实验数据的基础上,重点分析短语结构句法分析和依存句法分析的差别以及两者对语义角色标注的影响。实验结果表明,基于依存句法分析的语义角色标注系统的性能略好于基于短语结构句法分析的语义角色标注系统。 Firstly, two different syntactic forms, phrase structure-based syntactic tree and dependency tree are introduced in this paper with the comparison of their differences, Then by constructing two different SRL systems based on the above syntactic forms, and according to a series of experiment data, the difference of two syntactic forms and their effects on SRL are analysed as the focus. Our experimental results show that the dependency relation-based SRL performs slightly better than the phrase structure-based SRL.
作者 张育 王红玲 周国栋
机构地区 苏州大学计算机科学与技术学院
出处 《计算机应用与软件》 CSCD 2010年第8期13-16,共4页 Computer Applications and Software
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(60673041 60873150) 江苏省自然科学重大基础研究项目(08KJA520002)
关键词 语义角色标注 依存句法分析 短语结构句法分析 Semantic role labelling Dependency parsing Phrase structure-based syntactic parsing
分类号 TP391 [自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术]
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1车万翔,刘挺,李生.自动浅层语义分析[C].中国中文信息学会二十五周年学术会议,2006.
  • 2Gildea D,Jurafsky D.Automatic labeling of semantic roles[J].Computational Linguistics,2002,28(3):245-288.
  • 3Gildea D,Palmer M.The necessity of syntactic parsing for predicate argument recognition[C]//Proc.of ACL-2002,2002,239-246.
  • 4Xue N,Palmer M.Calibrating features for semantic role labeling[C]//Proc.of EMNLP-2004,2004,113-121.
  • 5刘挺,车万翔,李生.基于最大熵分类器的语义角色标注[J].软件学报,2007,18(3):565-573. 被引量：73
  • 6Hacioglu K,Pradhan S,Ward W,et al.Shallow semantic parsing using Support Vector Machines[R].TR-CSLR-2003-1,2003,135-144.
  • 7Robinson J.Dependency structures and transformational rules[J].Language,1970,46(2):259-285.
  • 8Charniak E.A maximum-entropy-inspired parser[C]//Proc.of the NAACL 2000.Washington:ACL,2000,132-139.
  • 9Mcdonald R,Pereira F,Ribarov K,et al.Non-Projective Dependency Parsing using Spanning Tree Algorithms[R].HLT-EMNLP,2005,112-123.
  • 10Carreras X,Marquez L.Introduction to the CoNLL-2005 Shared Task:Semantic Role Labeling[C]//Proc.of CoNLL 2005,2005,152-164.

二级参考文献28

  • 1Chen SF, Rosenfeld R. A Gaussian prior for smoothing maximum entropy models. Technical Report, CMU-CS-99-108, 1999.
  • 2Gildea D, Jurafsky D. Automatic labeling of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 2002,28(3):245-288.
  • 3Baker CF, Fillmore CJ, Lowe JB. The Berkeley FrameNet project. In: Boitet C, Whitelock P, eds. Proc. of the ACL&Coling'98.Montreal: ACL, 1998. 86-90.
  • 4Palmer M, Gildea D, Kingsbury P. The Proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 2005,31(1):71-106.
  • 5Erk K, Kowalski A, Pado S, Pinkal M. Towards a resource for lexical semantics: A large german corpus with extensive semantic annotation. In: Hinrichs EW, Roth D, eds. Proc. of the ACL 2003. Sapporo: ACL, 2003. 537-544.
  • 6Chen J, Rainbow O. Use of deep linguistic features for the recognition and labeling of semantic arguments. In: Hinrichs EW, Roth D, eds. Proc. of the EMNLP 2003. Sapporo: ACL, 2003.41-48.
  • 7Nielsen RD, Pradhan S. Mixing weak learners in semantic parsing. In: Lin D, Wu D, eds. Proc. of the EMNLP 2004. Barcelona:ACL, 2004. 80-87.
  • 8Pradhan S, Hacioglu K, Krugler V, Ward W, Martin JH, Jurafsky D. Support vector learning for semantic argument classification.Machine Learning Journal, 2005,60(3): 11-39.
  • 9Carreras X, Marques L, Chrupala G. Hierarchical recognition of propositional arguments with perceptrons. In: Ng HT, Riloff E, eds.Proc. of the CoNLL 2004. Boston: ACL, 2004.106-109.
  • 10Punyakanok V, Koomen P, Roth D, Yih W. Generalized inference with multiple semantic role labeling systems. In: Knight K, Ng HT, Oflazer K, eds. Proc. of the CoNLL 2005. Ann Arbor: ACL, 2005. 181-184.

共引文献74

同被引文献30

  • 1周国光.汉语配价语法论略[J].南京师大学报（社会科学版）,1994(4):103-106. 被引量：31
  • 2Hai Zhao,Chunyu Kit.Parsing syntactic and semantic dependencies with two single-stage maximum entropy models[C]//Proceedings of the 12th CoNLL-2008,Manchester,August 2008:203-207.
  • 3Sameer Pradhan,Wayne Ward,Kadri Hacioglu,et al. Shallow Semantic Parsing Using Support Vector Machines[C]//Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 04.2004.
  • 4Taku Kudo,Yuji Matsumoto.Use of support vector learning for chunk identification[C]//Proceedings of CoNLL-2000 and LLL-2000,Lisbon,Portugal,2000:142-144.
  • 5Taku Kudo,Yuji Matsumoto.Chunking with support vector machines[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL-2001).
  • 6Richard Johansson,Pierre Nugues.Dependency-based syntactic semantic analysis with PropBank and NomBank[C]//Proceedings of the 12th CoNLL-2008,Manchester,August 2008:183-187.
  • 7Chih-Jen Lin,Ruby C.Weng,S. Sathiya Keerthi.Trust region Newton method for large-scale logistic regression[C]//Proceedings of the 24 th International Conference on Machine Learning, Corvallis, OR,2007.
  • 8Nianwen Xue,Palmer M.Calibrating features for semantic role labeling[C]//Proceedings of EMNLP,Barcelona,Spain,2004:88-94.
  • 9Manning C D, Schutze H. Foundations of statistical natural language processing[M]. London: the MIT Press, 1999: 184-197.
  • 10Joshua G. A bit of progress in language modeling[J]. Computer Speech and Language, 2001, 15(4): 403-434.

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

计算机应用与软件
2010年 第8期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部