摘要
目的:对《证类本草》引用《本草拾遗》版本考证。方法;采用宋代官修本草《开宝》《嘉祐》《图经》引用《本草拾遗》的版本内容进行考证。结果:《证类本草》所引用的《本草拾遗》同(开宝》《嘉祐》《图经》等,官修本草所引用的《本草拾遗》并非同一版本。结论:提示今天对《本革拾遗》的研究,引用时应注意其传世版本的不同。
OBJECIVE:To be found correct pattern of Omissions from the Materia Medica was quoted by Classified Materia Medica. METHOD:There are make a detailed research to Omissions from the Materia Medica was quoted in Materia Medica Arranged According to pattern and offi-cial in the Song Dynasty. BESULT:The foreword of Omissins from the Materia Medica and Xinzhuyun,New annotations had been quoted in Materia Medica Arranged According to pattern, and missed in official Classics of Materia Medica,but it was supplemented by later generations in later Tang Dynasty or the Five Dynasty. CONCLUSION:This fact would be paid more attention, from now on,when we study or quote Omissions from the Materia Medica.
出处
《基层中药杂志》
1999年第2期57-59,共3页
Primary Journal of Chinese Materia Medica
关键词
本草拾遗
版本考证
证类本草
Omissions from the Materia Medica,textual reserach to pattern.
