摘要
目的:比较推拿手法加易筋经锻炼和单纯推拿手法治疗膝骨性关节炎的临床疗效。方法:将60例膝骨性关节炎患者随机分为两组,治疗组采用推拿手法配合患者易筋经锻炼,对照组采用单纯推拿手法,各治疗1个月。采用骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)量表分别在治疗前及治疗后进行疗效评定。结果:治疗后两组的总体症状、疼痛、僵硬和日常活动功能积分均较治疗前明显降低(P<0.01),且治疗组的各项积分低于对照组(P<0.05,P<0.01);治疗组的WOMAC总评分改善率明显高于对照组(P<0.01)。结论:推拿配合易筋经锻炼和单纯推拿手法治疗膝骨性关节炎疗效确切,且推拿配合易筋经组优于单纯推拿手法治疗组。
Objective：To compare the clinical efficacy between Tuina plus Yijinjing and Tuina therapies for knee osteoarthritis （ KOA）. Methods：Sixty KOA cases were divided into two groups：treatment group in which 30 cases were treated by Tuina plus Yijinjing and control group in which another 30 cases were treated by Tuina,with a course of one month. Western Ontario Mac Master（ WOMAC） scores were observed in the two groups before and after treatments. Results：After treatments,the WOMAC scores of overall symptoms,pain,stiffness and daily activity were reduced in both groups in comparison with before treatments （ P 0. 01） ; and the scores were reduced more significantly in treatment group than in control group（ P 0. 05,P 0. 01）. The improvement rate was higher in treatment group than in control group （ P 0. 01）. Conclusion：Tuina plus Yijinjing and Tuina are quite effective for KOA,but Tuina plus Yijinjing works better than Tuina.
出处
《辽宁中医杂志》
CAS
北大核心
2010年第9期1793-1795,共3页
Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金
上海市科技创新行动计划重点科技项目资助(08411961100)
上海市重点学科建设项目资助(S30304)
关键词
膝骨性关节炎
推拿加易筋经
推拿手法
WOMAC评分
Knee osteoarthritis（ KOA）
Tuina plus Yijinjing
Tuina
Western Ontario Mac Master（ WOMAC） score
