期刊文献+

紫外辐射传输模式计算与实际测量的比较 被引量:26

Comparison of UV Simulation and Measurements of SurfaceUltraviolet Radiation
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用改进的离散坐标法紫外辐射传输模式,应用各种可测得的实际大气物理参数,模拟了1993年7月24日德国加尔米希一帕特科琛(Garmisch—Partenkirchen,47.47°N,1107°E)地面紫外辐射的全天分布,并与1993年秋天第三次欧洲紫外辐射光谱仪比对活动期间通过了严格绝对标定的奥地利莫斯布鲁克(Innsbruck)大学的紫外光谱仪的实际观测资料进行了比较,进行了余弦响应订正后,计算与测量的绝对值差别很小,最大误差对地面UVB通量(280~320nm)是0.07W/m2(正午的通量为3、2W/m2)。对UVA(320~400nm)最大误差是26W/m2(正午通量为54W/m2)计算与测量的平均偏差为5%~13%,这表明,地面紫外辐射水平也可以利用其他大气观测资料通过模式计算间接得到。 The surface UV radiation in Garmisch-Partenkirchen (47.47°N, 11.07°E) measured everyhour on July 24, 1993 has been simulated using a modified DISORT UV radiative transfer model withmeasured atmospheric parameters as inputs. The simulation has been compared to the measurementwith the spectroradiometer of the University of Innsbruck, Austria, for which accurate absolutecalibration has been conducted during the period of the third Intercomparison of European UltravioletSpectroradiometers in the Autumn of 1993. The average discrepancy between simulation andmeasurement was 5%-- 13%, the comparison shows that the absolute differences between model andmeasurement with cosine response correction are very small, the maximum errors are 0.07 W/ m2 forsurface UVB (280~ 320 um) flux compared to about 3.2 W/ m2 at noon and 2.6 W / m2 for UVA(320~ 400 um) flux compared to about 54 W/ m2 at noon. This means that the surface UV radiationcan be well simulated by measuring some key atmospheric measurements.
出处 《大气科学》 CSCD 北大核心 1999年第3期359-364,共6页 Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences
基金 中国科学院择优支持回国工作基金 国家人事部留学人员科技活动经费 国家自然科学基金!49875001
关键词 紫外辐射 辐射传输模式 紫外测量 实际测量 ultraviolet radiation radiative transfer model UV measurement
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献7

共引文献64

同被引文献162

引证文献26

二级引证文献155

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部