摘要
财产自由权是"对国家的自由",而福利权是"通过国家保障的权利",如何看待和调适这两种不同性质的权利间的冲突是当代宪政思想的主题,其中不同学术流派对正义的阐释为我们分析相关问题提供了丰富的智识资源。罗尔斯的"分配正义论"和以戴维.米勒为代表的社群主义者的"复合多元正义论"为公民的福利权进行辩护;新自由主义者诺奇克的"持有正义论"和哈耶克的"自由秩序正义论"则十分重视财产自由权的优先地位。在吉登斯的"第三条道路"正义观中,集体主义价值取向的社群主义、古典社会民主主义同新自由主义的对立不是绝对的,而是可以相互借鉴的。受该理论影响,采取混合式的、多元主体参与的柔软的社会体系是当前欧洲福利国家调适上述冲突的一种被广泛尝试的方案。该方案对我国当前福利制度完善有很强的借鉴意义。
Free Right of Property is ＂freedom from the state＂,while Right of Welfare is ＂right protected by the state＂.How to treat and adjust the two rights with different nature is the central concern in contemporary constitutional thought.Interpretations of justice of different schools contribute to the analysis of related issues.Rawls’ ＂distributive justice＂ and ＂Theory of synthesis of multi-justice＂ of socialist communitarianists repre-sented by David Miller defend welfare right of the citizen;＂justice of holdings＂ of neo-liberalist Nozick and ＂justice of liberal order＂ of Hayek regard highly the priority of free right of property.According to the ＂third way＂ of Giddens,the opposition between collectivism-oriented socialist communitarianism,classical social democracy and neo-liberalism is not absolute,but can be used as reference.Influenced by this,a soft social system with a mixed,multi-subjective participation is the general practice in contemporary welfare countries in Europe to adjust the conflict,which can also be the reference to improve the welfare system in China.
出处
《求是学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第4期71-78,共8页
Seeking Truth
关键词
福利权
财产自由权
正义
welfare right
free right of property
justice
