2Tsesis I, Rosen E, Schwartz-Arad D, et al. Retrospective evaluation of surgical endodontic treatment: traditional versus modem technique. J Endod,2006,32 (5) :412-416.
3Rud J, Andreasen JO, Jensen JE. Radiographic criteria for the assessment of healing after endodontic surgery. Int J Oral Surg, 1972, 1 (4) : 195-214.
4Molven O, Halse A, Grung B. Incomplete healing ( scar tissue) after periapical surgery--radiogTaphic findings 8 to 12 years after treatment. J Endod, 1996,22 (5) ,264-268.
5Molven O,Halse A, Grung B. Observer strategy and the radiographic classification of healing after endodontic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1987,16(4) :432-439.
6Zuolo ML, Ferreira MO, Gutmann JL Prognosis in periradicular surgery: a clinical prospective study. Int Endod J,2000,33 (2) :91- 98.
7Rubinstein RA, Kin S. Shour-term observation of the results of endodontic surgery with the use of a surgical peration microscope and Super-EBA as root end filling material J Endod, 1999,25 ( 1 ) : 43- 48.
8Jesslen P, Zetterqvist L, Heimdahl A. Long-term results of amalgam versus glass ionomer cement as apical sealant after apieectomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 1995,79 ( 1 ) : 101- 103.
9Chong BS,Pitt Ford TR, Hudson MB. A prospective clinical study of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and IRM when used as mot-end filling materials in endodontic surgery. Int Endod J,2003,36(8 ) :520-526.
10Saunders WP. A prospective clinical study of periradicular surgery using mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end fiUing. J Endod, 2008, 34(6) :660-665.
1Ingle JI, Bakland LK. Endodontics [M]. 5th ed. London: BC Decker Inc, 2002 : 270-271.
2Baek SH, Plenk H Jr, K im S. Periapical tissue responses and ce- mentum regeneration with amalgam, super EBA, and MTA as rootend filling materials[J]. J Endod, 2005,31 (6) : 444-449.
3Vanderweele RA,Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ. Effect of blood con- tamination on retention characteristics of MTA when mixed with different liquids[J]. J Endod, 2006,32 (5) : 421-424.
