期刊文献+

白细胞突触:结构、功能和意义 被引量:3

Leukocyte Synapse:Structure,Function and Significance
暂未订购
导出
摘要 神经突触是神经网络的关键性结构,免疫网络主要是无形网络。近年来的研究进展表明,免疫细胞在有些功能状态下形成白细胞突触,称为免疫学突触(immunological synapse,IS),构成局部暂时性结构网络,实际上是动态结构,有人将其分为synapse和kinapse。研究表明,不同白细胞的IS不尽相同,炎症细胞和白血病细胞的IS有其特点。在有些病毒感染的白细胞中也观察到类似结构,称为病毒学突触(virological synapse,VS),是病毒在细胞间传播的一种机制,它不仅提高了传染效率,还逃逸了抗体的中和作用,导致持续性感染。最近法国学者报道了呈花瓣样的多聚突触(polysynapses),即花瓣样的多个细胞膜纳米管道,病毒能从一个感染细胞同时传播给多个邻近细胞。本文作者显示了早期工作中观察到的感染EB病毒的人白血病细胞系J6-2中的类似结构。作者结合工作中的体会评述白细胞突触的结构和功能,探讨其生物学意义。 Neuronal synapse is the critical structure of neuronal network. Immune system is mainly consisted of invisible network. Recently, evidence showed that leukocyte synapses between immune cells named as immunological synapses (IS), were formed under some functional conditions to form temporal local network. In fact, they are dynamic structures, which can be classified into synapse and kinapse. Different leukocytes have different synapses. Inflammatory and leukemic cells showed special patterns of IS. Similar structure is also observed in some viral infected lymphocytes, which is called virological synapse (VS). This is one of the mechanisms for viral transmission, not only enhancing the transmission efficiency but also mediating the escape from antibody neutralization, leading persistent infection. Recently the flower-like polysynapses was reported by Franch scientists. This is a multi-tunneling nanotube flower-like structure on cell surface. We had observed this kind of structure in EB virus infected human leukemic cell line J6-2. In this paper, the structure and function of leukocyte synapses are reviewed combined with anthors'own work. Their significance is discussed.
出处 《中国实验血液学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2010年第4期829-833,共5页 Journal of Experimental Hematology
基金 国家自然科学基金(编号30971111,30872983)
关键词 免疫网络 白细胞突触 免疫学突触 病毒学突触 多聚突触 (immune network leukocyte synapse immunological synapse virological synapse polysynapse)
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Fraser IDC, Germain RN. Navigating the network: signaling crosstalk in hematopoietic cells. Nat Immunol, 2009; 10(4) : 327 -331.
  • 2Brodsky IE, Medzhitov R. Targeting of immune signaling networks by bacterial pathogens. Nat Cell Biol, 2009; 11(5) : 521 -526.
  • 3Piguet V, Sattentan Q. Dangerous liaisons at the virological synapse. J Clin Invest, 2004 ; 114 (5) :605 - 611.
  • 4Dustin ML. The cellular context of T cell signaling. Immunity, 2009; 30(4) : 482 -493.
  • 5Roda-Navarro P. Assembly and function of the natural killer cell immune synapse. Front Biosclence, 2009 ; 14 : 621 - 633.
  • 6Thauland TJ, Koguchi Y, Wetzel SA, et al. Th1 and Th2 cells form morphologically distinct immunological synapses. J Immunol, 2008; 181 ( 1 ) :393 -399.
  • 7Quintana A, Schwindling C, Wenning AS, et al, T cell activation requires mitochondrial translocation to the immunological synapse. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 2007 ; 104(36) : 14418 - 14423.
  • 8Li D, Molldrem JJ, Ma Q. LFA-1 regulates CD8^+ T cell activation via TCR-mediated and LFA-1 mediated Erk1/2 signal pathways. J Bio Chem, 2009; 284(31 ):21001 -21010.
  • 9Ilani T, Vasiliver-Shamis G, Vardhana Sm et al. T cell antigen receptor signaling and immunological synapse stability require myosin ⅡA. Nat Immunol, 2009; 10(5) : 531 -540.
  • 10Dustin ML. T-cell activation through immunological synapses and kinapses. Immunol Rev, 2008; 221:77 -89.

二级参考文献74

共引文献32

同被引文献41

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部