摘要
文章围绕道德判断的理性加工与非理性加工展开。已有神经影像研究表明,道德判断包含非理性加工,但是否包含理性加工仍存争议。当道德判断视为类属概念时,研究倾向支持道德判断的非理性加工;当视为类似记忆的连续体时,倾向支持理性与非理性的双加工。研究还显示,个体进行风险回避的道德判断时多是基于行动的非理性判断;进行奖赏趋近道德判断时多是基于意图的非理性判断。未来研究应完善实验设计,在整合检测技术基础上,对亲社会道德判断和反社会道德判断及基于客观和主观损益的判断加工进行进一步探讨。
The paper focuses on irrational and rational moral judgments. Existing works on the neural mechanism of moral judgment reveal that moral judgment includes irrational processing. However, whether it includes rational judgment or not is controversial. Further studies indicate that when morality judgments are regarded as a category, studies tend to support irrational judgment; when it is a continuum hierarchy structure, studies tend to support the dualprocess. Studies in the future should investigate moral judgment with ingenious experimental designs, give further exploration into the neural mechanism of prosocial and antisocial moral judgments and into rational moral judgment based on objective or subjective weight of benefit and loss.
出处
《心理科学》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2010年第4期807-810,共4页
Journal of Psychological Science
关键词
道德判断
认知神经科学
情绪加工
认知加工
Moral Judgments, Cognitive Neuroscience, Emotional Processing, Cognitive Processing
