摘要
中国传统文化经新文化运动、"文化大革命"及"第二次启蒙运动"三次批判,持续被污名化。因此相反的两种观点,在对传统文化的否定性预设上却是一致的:马克思主义中国化是与传统文化决裂的(其另一表达式是"只吸收精华");或是与传统文化结合而"被封建化"(其另一表达式是"只承受糟粕")。20世纪80年代末以来,随着国学热的兴起,传统文化逐渐"恢复名誉"。90年代以来开始认为,传统文化与马克思主义的结合,可以排在中国革命实践与马克思主义的结合之后,"决裂论"和"封建化论"被认为是简单肤浅的。于是用文化学方法研究马克思主义中国化的学者日益增多,本文就其方法论作一小结。
Chinese traditional culture had been continuously defamed inthe new cultural movement, the 'great cultural revolution' and the 'second enlightening movement'. The two opposite views are unanimous in negating the traditional culture: the Sinonization of Marxism in China is a breakage with the traditional culture (another expres - sion is 'only takes the prime') or combines with the traditional culture and get 'feudalized' (another expression is 'only takes wastes'). Since the end of 1980s, with an increasing interest in the traditional national culture, the traditional culture has gradually gained its fame. Since the 1990s, it is considered that the combination of the traditional culture and Marxism may be ranked second to the combination of Chinese revolutionary practice and Marxism, and either 'breakage' or 'feudalization' is considered as superficial. More and more people began to study the Sinonization of Marxism with a cultural method and this paper is a summary of the methodologies.
出处
《毛泽东邓小平理论研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第7期69-75,共7页
Studies on Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping Theories
基金
国家哲学社会科学基金项目"马克思主义中国化研究九十年学术史撮要"[08BKS011]阶段性成果之一
