期刊文献+

湿地草本植物冠层昆虫群落的中性理论验证

Testing the Neutral Theory of Insect Communities in the Canopy of Wetland Herbaceous Plants
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 生物多样性中性理论(Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity)对群落中物种共存机制和多度分布提出不同于传统生态位理论的另一种解释:由处于同一营养级的物种构成的群落中,不同物种的个体间在生态学上是等价的;物种多度的分布主要决定于随机过程,如物种灭绝和物种迁入/新物种分化之间的动态平衡。对于中性理论模型是否可以准确预测物种多度分布一直存在不小的争论。本文对生长在天目山地区的湿地草本植物冠层的昆虫群落进行取样调查,分别采用中性理论模型和对数正态模型预测昆虫多度分布。采用置信区间、拟合优度检验和卡方检验等方法验证中性理论的预测。中性模型拟合的基本多样性指数θ=5.89,迁移率m=0.208 8。实测物种多度数据全部落入中性模型预测的95%置信区间内,说明中性模型预测的多度分布与实测数据基本吻合。Pearson相关性检验、Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验和卡方检验的结果表明,中性最优拟合曲线(200次中性模型模拟的平均值)的拟合优度与对数正态模型很接近,但中性理论模型的预测结果只在4%~14%的情况下(中性模型模拟200次)优于对数正态模型。因此,中性理论模型可以较好地预测天目山湿地草本植物冠层中的昆虫群落的多度分布情况,但其拟合优度并不优于对数正态模型。 The unified neutral theory of biodiversity offers an alternative explanation to the species coexistence and abundance distribution mechanisms in a community,other than the traditional niche theory: individuals from different species within the same trophic level are ecologically equivalent;the determination of species abundance distribution is a stochastic process based on the dynamic balance of death,immigration,and/or speciation.Much debate has been focused on whether the neutral model can successfully predict the species abundance distribution.In this paper,the insect communities in the canopy of wetland herbaceous plants growing in Tianmu Moutains was investigated and insect spe- cies abundance distribution predicted using neutral model and lognormal model,respectively.The neutral model predictions was tested with confidence intervals,goodness—of—fit test,and chisquare test.Neutral model yielded the fundamental diversity numberθ=5.89,migrate rate m = 0. 2088.The result showed that the observed insect species abundance distributions completely fall into the 95%confidence interval of the neutral model predictions,indicating the match between the species abundance predictions by neutral model and the observed data.Kolmogorov—Smirnov test and chisquare test showed the best estimate curve of neutral model(average value of 200 neutral model simulations) has a goodness—of—fit close to that of the lognormal model,but with only 4%—14%of the times(among the 200 simulations) better than the lognormal model.Therefore,it was concluded that the neutral model can predict the abundance distribution of insect communities in the canopy of wetland herbaceous plants in Tianmu Moutains,however,with a goodness—of—fit not as good as the lognormal model.
出处 《陕西林业科技》 2009年第4期6-10,共5页 Shaanxi Forest Science and Technology
基金 "国家基础科学人才培养基金"项目[复旦大学生物学基地/批准号J0630643] 国家重点基础研究发展规划(973)项目(2006CB403305) 国家自然科学基金项目(30400052)资助
关键词 昆虫群落 中性理论模型 对数正态模型 Insect community neutral model lognormal model
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Alonso D,Etienne RS,McKane AJ.The merits of neutral theory[J].Trends in Ecology and Evolution,2006,21(8):451-457.
  • 2杜晓光,周淑荣.亚高寒草甸植物群落的中性理论验证[J].植物生态学报,2008,32(2):347-354. 被引量:11
  • 3Hankin RKS (2007) Introducing untb,an R package for simulating the United Neutral Theory of Biodiversity.http://www.jstatsoft.org.
  • 4He F.Deriving a neutral model of species abundance from fundamental mechanisms of population dynamics[J].Functional Ecology,2005,19:187-193.
  • 5Hubbell SP.The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography.Princeton University Press.Princeton,2001.
  • 6刘灿然,马克平,于顺利,王巍.北京东灵山地区植物群落多样性的研究 Ⅳ.样本大小对多样性测度的影响[J].生态学报,1997,17(6):601-610. 被引量:66
  • 7MeGill BJ A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity[J].Nature,2003,422:881-885.
  • 8McGill BJ,Maurer BA,Weiser MD.Empirical evaluation of neutral theory[J].Ecology,2006,87(6):1411-1423.
  • 9Poulin R.Parasites and the neutral theory of biodiversity[J].Ecography,2004,27:119-123.
  • 10R Development Core Team (RDCT) (2009) R,A language and environment for statistical computing,http:// www.R-project.org.

二级参考文献55

  • 1杜国祯,王刚.甘南亚高山草甸人工草地的演替和质量变化[J].Acta Botanica Sinica,1995,37(4):306-313. 被引量:52
  • 2周淑荣,张大勇.群落生态学的中性理论[J].植物生态学报,2006,30(5):868-877. 被引量:65
  • 3卢泽愚,数学生态学(第2版),1988年
  • 4陈华豪,东北林业学院学报,1984年,12卷,增刊,134页
  • 5Zhang DY (张大勇) (2000).Researches on Theoretical Ecology (理论生态学研究).Higher Education Press,Beijing.
  • 6Yu DW, Terborgh JW, Potts MD (1998). Can high tree species richness be explained by Hubbell's null model? Ecology Letters, 1, 193- 199.
  • 7Zhang DY,Lin K (1997). The effects of competitive asymmetry on the rate of competitive displacement: how robust is Hubbell's community drift model? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 188, 361 - 367.
  • 8Zhou SR,Zhang DY (2006). Allee effects and the neutral theory of biodiversity. Functional Ecology, 20, 509- 513.
  • 9Abrams PA (2001). A world without competition. Nature, 412, 858 - 859.
  • 10Alonso D, Etienne RS, McKane AJ (2006). The merits of neutral theory. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21,451 -457.

共引文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部