FDI、环境规制与污染避难所效应——基于中国省级数据的经验分析被引量：77

FDI,Environmental Regulation and Pollution Haven Effect——Empirical Analysis of China's Provincial Panel Data

下载PDF

导出

摘要随着中国吸引FDI的规模不断攀升,环境污染水平也呈现不断恶化趋势。污染避难所假说认为,污染密集型的跨国企业为了规避本国严格的环境规制而迁往环境规制较宽松的国家,但相关的实证研究无法得到令人信服的证据。本文采用1998-2007年我国30个省市自治区的数据,利用综合指数方法构建我国的环境规制指标,同时通过引入政府效率指标、政府反腐败程度指标和其它控制指标来建立计量模型以充分反映我国各地区的特征。结果显示,环境规制与FDI的关系显著为负,这说明外商在对我国进行区位选择时,认为环境规制是一个非常重要的因素,在我国国内各地区间存在着污染避难所效应。同时,政府效率和政府反腐败程度也是外资区位选择的重要因素,特别是东部地区对政府效率和政府反腐败程度更加敏感。 With the rapid development of China's FDI absorption,the environmental pollution has been rising as well. Pollution-intensive FDI will locate to countries with laxer environmental regulations to escape strict environmental regulations of its domestic country,which is called as Pollution Haven Effect,but empirical analysis could not get convincing results. This paper uses 30 provincial panel data from 1998-2007 and uses aggregated index to measure environmental regulations and government efficiency index,anticorruption index and other controlled index to construct econometric model. The results show that the relation between environmental regulations and FDI is negative,which indicates that environmental regulation is a very important factor affecting FDI's location and pollution haven effect exists among China's provinces. Government efficiency and anticorruption strength are also important factors influencing FDI's location,especially among the coastal areas.

作者傅京燕李丽莎

机构地区暨南大学经济学院

出处《公共管理学报》 CSSCI 2010年第3期65-74,共10页 Journal of Public Management

基金国家自然科学基金项目(70703015) 教育部重大攻关课题(08JZD0014)

关键词 FDI 环境规制污染避难所效应 FDI Environmental Regulation Pollution Haven Effect

分类号 X323 [环境科学与工程—环境工程]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献20

1中国环境与发展高层课题组.中国环境与发展回顾和展望[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2007.
2JUDITH D. Does Trade Liberalization Harm the Environment? [R]. World Bank discusstion paper, 1999.
3ZARSKY L. Havens, Halos and Spaghetti: Untangling the Evidence about Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment [C]. Paper presented at an OECD Conference on Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment, 28th and 29th January, The Hague, Netherlands, 1999.
4XING Y, KOLSTAD C. Do Lax Environmental Regulations Attract Foreign Investment? [R]. University of California Santa Barbara working paper, 1998.
5ESKELAND, GUNNAR, ANN H. Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution-Haven Hypothesis [R]. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1744, 1997.
6LETCHUMANNAN, RAMAN, FUMIO K. Reconciling the Conflict Between the Pollution Haven Hypothesis and an Emerging Trajectory of International Technology Transfer [J]. Research Policy, 2000,29 : 59-79.
7WHEELER D. Racing to the Bottom? Foreign Investment and Air Quality in Developing Countries [R]. The World Bank working paper, 2000.
8DAMANI, RICHARD, FREDRIKSSON, JOHN A. Trade Liberalization, Corruption and Environmental Policy Formation: Theory and Evidence [R]. CIES Discussion Paper No.47, Australia: Adelaide University, 2000.
9ESTY D, MICHAEL P. Measuring National Environmental Performance and Its Determinants[C]//MICHAEL P, JEFFREY S, et al. The Global Competitiveness Report, 2000.
10HINES J. Forbidden Payment: Foreign Bribery and American Business after 1977[R]. NBER Working Paper 5266, 1995.