期刊文献+

3种不同手术方式治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ期内痔的疗效比较 被引量:5

Curative effect comparison of three different modus operandi on internal hemorrhoid in Ⅲ and Ⅳ stage
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的评价改良吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(PPH术)在治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ期内痔的临床效果。方法将90例Ⅲ、Ⅳ期内痔患者随机分为痔环形切除术组、常规PPH组和改良PPH手术组,每组各30例,比较观察3组的手术时间、术后疼痛、术后并发症及术后复发情况。结果改良PPH组与常规PPH组比较,手术时间、术后疼痛均无显著性差异(P均>0.05),改良PPH组术后并发症发生率、复发率均低(P均<0.05)。痔环形切除术组与其他2组比较手术时间、术后疼痛、术后并发症发生率、复发率均有显著性差异(P均<0.05)。结论改良PPH在Ⅲ、Ⅳ期内痔治疗中能明显减少手术时间、术后疼痛,降低术后并发症发生率及复发率,改良PPH是治疗重度脱垂性内痔的理想方法。 Objective It is to evaluate the clinical effect of improved procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH) on internal hemorrhoid in Ⅲ and Ⅳ stage.Methods 90 patients with internal hemorrhoid in Ⅲ and Ⅳ stage were randomly divided into whitehead operation group,routine PPH group and improved PPH group in which there was 30 cases.The status of operation time,postoperative pain,postoperative complications and postoperative recurrence in the three groups were observed and compared.Results There were both no significant differences on operation time and postoperative pain between improved PPH group and routine PPH group(both P0.05).The rates of postoperative complications and postoperative recurrence in improved PPH group were both lower than that in routine PPH group(both P0.05).There were all significant differences on operation time,postoperative pain and the rates of postoperative complications and postoperative recurrence between whitehead operation group and the other two groups(all P0.05).Conclusion Improved PPH can obviously decrease operation time and postoperative pain and lower the rates of postoperative complications and postoperative recurrence in the treatment for internal hemorrhoid in Ⅲ and Ⅳ stage.Improved PPH is an ideal treatment method for severe Prolapsed internal hemorrhoids.
作者 徐杨荣
出处 《现代中西医结合杂志》 CAS 2010年第23期2870-2871,共2页 Modern Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
关键词 吻合器痔上黏膜环切术 改良吻合器痔上黏膜环切术 痔环形切除术 hemorrhoid procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids improved procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids whitehead operation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献15

  • 1Mehigan B J, Monson JRT, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan - Morgan haemorrhoidectomy : randomised controlled trial[J] . Lancet, 2000, 355 ( 9206 ):782 -785.
  • 2Fazio VW. Early promise of stapling technique for haemorrhoidectomy[J]. Lancet, 2000,355(9206) :768 -769.
  • 3Gunnoar A, Hans K, Staffan H. Closed vs. open hemorrhoidec-tomy- is there any difference? [J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2000,43(1) :31 -34.
  • 4Como F, Muratore A, Mistrangelo M. Complications of the surgical treatment of hemorrhoids and its therapy [ J ] . Ann Ital Chir,1995,66(6) :813 -816.
  • 5Thompson WHF. The nature of hemorrhoids [ J ]. Br J Surg ,1975, 62(7) :542 -552.
  • 6Lord PB, Kamm MA, Nichols RJ, et al. Hemorrhoids: pathology, pathophysiology and etiology[ J]. Br J Surg , 1994,81(7) :946 -954.
  • 7Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosaand hemorroidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure[C] . Proceedings of the 6 th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery . Italy:Rome June 3 ~6, 1998.777 -784.
  • 8Pope V,Dis Colon Rectum,2001年,44卷,4期,A5页
  • 9Longo A,Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery,1998年
  • 10史兆岐,中国大肠肛门病学,1985年,631页

共引文献586

同被引文献27

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部